Responses

Download PDFPDF

Presentation of congenital heart disease in infancy: implications for routine examination
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Cardiac murmurs in healthy newborn infants - have we updated our practice?
    • Nicola J Robertson, Consultant Neonatologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Jane Brock and Helena Gardiner

    Dear Editor

    We would like to highlight the varying practices in the management of cardiac murmurs in well newborn infants. Two years after the publication of Wren's important paper on this subject[1] urging an early definitive structural diagnosis to be made on such infants we conducted a telephone survey of local hospitals to assess whether practices had changed.

    Until recently it was common practice to...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.