Responses

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Neonatal jaundice in infants born at 37 weeks: is NICE treating too many?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    The "kinder, gentler" approach revisited
    • Janet Rennie, Honorary Consultant Neonatologist UCLH London
    • Other Contributors:
      • Kevin Ives, Consultant Neonatologist

    Sir,

    We read the letter from Noureldein and colleagues with interest. As former members of the NICE guideline committee on neonatal jaundice and individuals who have advised on many medico-legal claims involving kernicterus, we retain our interest in the topic. Thirty years after discussions about a “kinder, gentler” approach (1), the choice of threshold values for phototherapy remains contentious. The Birmingham group question whether the decision to treat babies born at 37 weeks gestation differently from those born at 38-42 weeks was justified. It took many years to appreciate that there was a significant difference regarding the risk of transient tachypnoea of the newborn between babies born at 37 weeks compared with more mature babies (2). Similar information about the risk of kernicterus is never likely to be forthcoming.

    The rationale for treating 37 week gestation babies differently from those born at >38 weeks was based in part on the observation that the less mature group were over-represented in the US kernicterus registry of 1992-2004 (3). Denominator numbers are not available but there were 24 cases at 37 weeks, and a total of 71 at >37 weeks. The new AAP guideline notes that the risk of neurotoxicity from hyperbilirubinaemia is higher at <38 weeks, and with an albumin <3 g/dL (4). The evidence examined for the NICE 2010 guideline consistently showed that a gestational age <38 weeks was associated with an increased risk of hyperbi...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.