Objective Methadone is a vital treatment for women with opioid use disorder in pregnancy. Previous reports suggested an association between methadone exposure and Pierre Robin sequence (PRS), a rare craniofacial anomaly. We assessed the association between gestational methadone exposure and PRS.
Design/setting This case-malformed control study used European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies population-based registries in Ireland, the Netherlands, Italy, Switzerland, Croatia, Malta, Portugal, Germany, Wales, Norway and Spain, 1995–2011.
Patients Cases included PRS based on International Classification of Disease (ICD), Ninth Edition-British Paediatric Association (BPA) code 75 603 or ICD, Tenth Edition-BPA code Q8708. Malformed controls were all non-PRS anomalies, excluding genetic conditions, among live births, fetal deaths from 20 weeks’ gestation and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomalies. An exploratory analysis assessed the association between methadone exposure and other congenital anomalies (CAs) excluding PRS. Methadone exposure was ascertained from medical records and maternal interview.
Results Among 87 979 CA registrations, there were 127 methadone-exposed pregnancies and 336 PRS cases. There was an association between methadone exposure and PRS (OR adjusted for registry 12.3, 95% CI 5.7 to 26.8). In absolute terms, this association reflects a risk increase from approximately 1–12 cases per 10 000 births. A raised OR was found for cleft palate (adjusted OR 5.0, 95% CI 2.7 to 9.2).
Conclusions These findings suggest that gestational methadone exposure is associated with PRS. The association may be explained by unmeasured confounding factors. The small increased risk of PRS in itself does not alter the risk–benefit balance for gestational methadone use. The association with cleft palate, a more common CA, should be assessed with independent data.
- opioid use disorder
- Pierre Robin sequence
- cleft palate
Statistics from Altmetric.com
BC and ML contributed equally.
Contributors BC conceptualised and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript and reviewed and revised the manuscript. ML assessed the study concept, designed the study, carried out the analysis, drafted the initial manuscript and reviewed and revised the manuscript. HD assessed the study concept, designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript and reviewed and revised the manuscript. M-CA, IB, HEKdW, CMD, MG, KK, BM, AN, AP, AR, DFT and OZ assessed the study concept, approved the study design, facilitated data collection and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval The ethics and consent arrangement for each EUROCAT member registry can be viewed at: Greenlees R, Neville A, Addor M-C, Amar E, Arriola L, Bakker M, Boyd P, Calzolari E, Doray B, Draper E, Vollset S E, Garne E, Gatt M, Haeusler M, Kallen K, Khoshnood B, Latos- Bielenska A, Martinez-Frias M-L, Materna-Kiryluk A, Dias C M, McDonnell R, Mullaney C, Nelen V, O’Mahony M, Pierini A, Queisser-Luft A, Randrianaivo-Ranjatoelina H, Rankin J, Rissmann A, Ritvanen A, Salvador J, Sipek A, Tucker D, Verellen-Dumoulin C, Wellesley D and Wertelecki W (2011). Paper 6: EUROCAT member registries: organization and activities. Birth Defects Research (Part A). 91: S51-S100.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement Additional data are not available.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.