Objective To determine if the electrical activity of the diaphragm, as measure of neural respiratory drive and breathing effort, changes over time in preterm infants transitioned from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to high flow nasal cannula (HFNC).
Design Prospective observational study.
Setting Neonatal intensive care unit.
Patients Stable preterm infants transitioned from nCPAP to HFNC using a 1:1 pressure to flow ratio.
Interventions The electrical activity of the diaphragm was measured by transcutaneous electromyography (dEMG) from 30 min before until 3 hours after the transition.
Main outcome measures At eight time points after the transition to HFNC, diaphragmatic activity was compared with the baseline on nCPAP. Percentage change in amplitudedEMG, peakdEMG and tonicdEMG were calculated. Furthermore, changes in respiratory rate, heart rate and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) were analysed.
Results Thirty-two preterm infants (mean gestational age: 28.1±2.2 weeks, mean birth weight: 1118±368 g) were included. Compared with nCPAP, the electrical activity of the diaphragm did not change during the first 3 hours on HFNC (median (IQR) change in amplitudedEMG at t=180 min: 2.81% (−21.51–14.10)). The respiratory rate, heart rate and FiO2 remained stable during the 3-hour measurement.
Conclusions Neural respiratory drive and breathing effort assessed by electrical activity of the diaphragm is similar in the first 3 hours after transitioning stable preterm infants from nCPAP to HFNC with a 1:1 pressure-to-flow ratio.
- Respiratory support
- High flow nasal cannula
- Diaphragmatic activity
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors CGdW wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Conception and study design: CGdW, GJH, FHdJ and AHvK. Collection, analysis and interpretation of data: CGdW, GJH, FHdJ and AHvK. Drafting the manuscript for important intellectual content: CGdW, GJH, JVK, FHdJ and AHvK. Decision to submit the paper for publication: CGdW, GJH, JVK, FHdJ and AHvK.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval METC AMC.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement Unpublished data of the measurements in this cohort are only accessible to the authors of the paper. It is saved in a locked database.