Responses

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Pulse oximetry as a screening tool for detecting major congenital heart defects in Indian newborns
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Numbers from flow-chart, text and tables do not match

    Dear Sir, First let me congratulate you for the phenomenal work that you have done at Safdarjung Hospital.

    On reading your paper, I found discrepancies in numbers in the flow chart (Fig 1) and Table 2: viz. out of 1599 abnormal babies on pulse oximetry, Echo confirmed 18 major and 15 critical CHDs. However, further in the text and in table 2, the corresponding numbers are cited as 39 major and 22 critical CHDs...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.