Download PDFPDF
Early onset neonatal sepsis: diagnostic dilemmas and practical management
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    In response to: Early onset neonatal sepsis: diagnostic dilemmas and practical management.
    • Job LB Gieling, Pediatric resident
    • Other Contributors:
      • C Kramers, HWHA Fleuren, GPJM Gerrits, and BA Semmekrot

    We read with interest the review by AR Bedford Russell and F Kumar[1] about challenges in diagnosing EONS. The authors state to await a 100% sensitive and 100% specific test. In theory, this gold standard is obtained by observing infants while withholding antibiotics, which obviously is unacceptable. Instead combinations of laboratory and clinical signs are used to exclude EONS. Understandably, these tests must have hi...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Re: I know you don't like our American brand of English, but......

    We thank Dr Perlin for his response which specifically refers to the prevention of early onset Group B streptococcus (GBS) infection.

    Similar declines in GBS EONS have been seen in many other countries that have introduced screening for GBS and IAP. In contrast, in the UK the RCOG recommendation for a risk based approach has not been associated with a fall in the incidence of GBS EONS. If the incidence fell by 75%,...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    I know you don't like our American brand of English, but......

    Dear Sir:

    I have read the most excellent review of early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) published recently in these Archives by Dr's Bedford Russell and Kumar. We, in America, have witnessed the gradual evolution from a risk factor approach initially advocated by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, (as opposed to universal screening during gestation, as recommended by the American Academy of P...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.