Statistics from Altmetric.com
Inguinal hernia (IH) repair in term infants and older children is associated with very low morbidity and little controversy. However, this procedure has a different risk profile in premature infants. It is the most common major operative procedure in this population and has much higher morbidity than in term infants and older children.1–3 The morbidity (and some mortality) is not appreciated by many outside the paediatric surgery and neonatology fields.4
The incidence of IH is reported to be 13%–15% in premature infants—though the true incidence may be higher—and is inversely related to gestational age.5 ,6 Despite the frequency of IH, there is no consensus regarding many aspects of its management. The controversial aspects of IH repair in premature infants that we will address include timing of repair, anaesthetic mode, and the potential of long-term neurocognitive impairment related to anaesthetic agents.
Many premature infants have cardiac or respiratory comorbidities and remain on oxygen at the time of IH repair. Severe apnoea and the need for ventilator support after operation are major concerns.7 Postoperative apnoea is known to be associated with a prior history of apnoea, prematurity and low postmenstrual age (PMA) at operation.3 ,8 ,9 In a case series with 47 premature infants, all of whom had IH repair prior to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge, 34% needed postoperative assisted ventilation, 23% had apneas/bradycardia and 4% required postoperative reintubation.10 Another review of 57 preterm infants showed that 8.8% either failed extubation or were unable to be extubated immediately postoperatively.11 Another case series of 126 preterm infants with IH repair reported a 5% apnoea rate; all of these infants had a prior history of apnoea.12 A fairly recent study showed that 13% of 45 premature infants who had IH repair …
Contributors MLB and EMD searched the existing literature and prepared the manuscript draft. VPP added anaesthesia expert content.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.