[HTML][HTML] Vagal neuromodulation in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

…, ET Mesquita, GM Sant'Anna, FM Sant'Anna - Frontiers in …, 2021 - frontiersin.org
…, EA Ferreira, MB Sant'Anna, PR Cardoso, ET Mesquita, GM Sant'Anna, FM Sant'Anna
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2021frontiersin.org
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of invasive vagal nerve
stimulation (VNS) in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Background: Heart failure (HF) is characterized by autonomic nervous system imbalance
and electrical events that can lead to sudden death. The effects of parasympathetic (vagal)
stimulation in patients with HF isn't well established. Methods: From May 1994 to July 2020,
a systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for …
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of invasive vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Background
Heart failure (HF) is characterized by autonomic nervous system imbalance and electrical events that can lead to sudden death. The effects of parasympathetic (vagal) stimulation in patients with HF isn’t well established.
Methods
From May 1994 to July 2020, a systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for clinical trials comparing VNS with medical therapy for man-agement of chronic HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%). A meta-analysis of several outcomes and adverse ef-fects was completed, and GRADE used to assess the level of evidence.
Results
Four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 3 prospective studies, totalizing 1263 patients were identified; 756 treated with VNS and 507 with medical therapy. RCT data were included in the meta-analysis (fixed-effect distribution). Adverse effects related to VNS were observed in only 11% of patients. VNS was associated with significant improvement (GRADE = High) in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (OR 2.72, 95%CI: 2.07-3.57, p < 0.0001), quality of life (MD -14.18, 95%CI: -18.09 to -10.28, p< 0.0001), 6-min walk test (MD 55.46, 95%CI: 39.11- 71.81, p< 0.0001) and NT-proBNP levels (MD -144.25, 95%CI: -238.31 to -50.18, p = 0.003). There was no difference in mortality (OR 1.24, 95%CI: 0.82-1.89, p = 0.43).
Conclusions
A high grade of evidence demonstrated that VNS improves NYHA functional class, 6-min walk test, quality of life and NT-proBNP levels in patients with chronic HFrEF, with no differences in mortality.
Frontiers
Showing the best result for this search. See all results