Comparison of propofol induction with thiopentone or methohexitone in short outpatient general anaesthesia

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988 Nov;32(8):607-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1988.tb02796.x.

Abstract

The per- and post-operative characteristics of three different i.v. anaesthetic induction agents were studied double-blindly in 75 patients admitted for outpatient gynaecological dilatation and curettage. All the patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg i.m. Induction started with alfentanil 0.015 mg/kg i.v. 60 s before either: propofol 2.2 mg/kg i.v., or thiopentone 4.0 mg/kg i.v., or methohexitone 2.0 mg/kg i.v. All the patients received 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The propofol patients were significantly better relaxed and had a higher incidence of hypotension during the procedure. The methohexitone patients had higher pulse rates and a higher frequency of hiccups during the procedure. Propofol induction resulted in a faster awakening of the patients and a better recovery function compared with methohexitone for the first 15 min and compared with thiopentone for the first 240 min after the procedure. Postoperative side-effects were less frequent in the thiopentone group, and minor abdominal pain was significantly more frequent in the propofol group. There was no significant difference between the groups for any variable after 240 min postoperatively.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
  • Anesthesia, General*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives*
  • Methohexital*
  • Middle Aged
  • Phenols*
  • Postoperative Period
  • Preanesthetic Medication*
  • Propofol
  • Thiopental*

Substances

  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Phenols
  • Methohexital
  • Thiopental
  • Propofol