Am J Perinatol 2002; 19(3): 127-132
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-25311
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Clinical Significance of True Umbilical Knots: A Population-Based Analysis

Urpu Airas, Seppo Heinonen
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 April 2002 (online)

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to determine the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes resulting from a true umbilical knot. We analyzed 288 singleton pregnancies with a true umbilical knot among the women who gave birth at Kuopio University Hospital from January 1990 to December 1999. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare pregnancy outcomes of the affected cases with those of the general obstetric population (n = 23,027). The incidence of true knot was 1.25% and it was associated with advanced maternal age, multiparity, previous miscarriages, obesity, prolonged gravidity, male fetus, long cord, and maternal anemia. The women having a fetus with a cord knot underwent cesarean delivery less frequently than unaffected controls. Fetal death and low Apgar score at 1 min occurred significantly more frequently in the study group than in the general obstetric population, the adjusted odds ratios being 3.93 (95% CI, 1.41-11.0) and 1.73 (95% CI, 1.10-2.72), respectively. Otherwise, the pregnancy outcome measures were comparable in the two groups. Fetuses with true umbilical knots are at a four-fold increased risk of stillbirth, but little can be done to prevent fetal deaths during pregnancy. Surviving fetuses with true knots are likely to suffer temporary distress during delivery, but affected newborns recover soon after birth. Thus, monitored vaginal delivery appears to be a safe option for fetuses with true knots.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Spellacy W N, Gravem H, Fisch R O. The umbilical cord complications of the true knots, nuchal coils and cords around the body.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1966;  94 1136-1142
  • 2 Naeye R L. Functionally important disorders of the placenta, umbilical cord and fetal membranes.  Hum Pathol . 1987;  18 680-691
  • 3 Rayburn W F, Beynen A, Brinkman D L. Umbilical cord length and intrapartum complications.  Obstet Gynecol . 1981;  57 450-452
  • 4 Eizenberg D. Antenatal true umbilical knot leading to fetal demise.  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol . 1998;  38 100-101
  • 5 Blickstein I, Shoham-Schwartz Z, Lancet M. Predisposing factors in the formation of true knots of the umbilical cord: analysis of morphometric and perinatal data.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet . 1987;  25 395-398
  • 6 Heifetz S A. The umbilical cord: obstetrically important lesions.  Clin Obstet Gynec . 1996;  39 571-587
  • 7 Walker C W, Pye B G. The length of the human umbilical cord: a statistical report.  Br Med J . 1960;  1 546-548
  • 8 Matorras R, Diez J, Pereira J G, Montoya F. True knots in the umbilical cord: clinical findings and fetal consequences.  J Obstet Gynaecol . 1990;  10 383-386
  • 9 McLennan H, Price E, Urbanska M, Craig N, Fraser M. Umbilical cord knots and encirclements.  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol . 1998;  28 116-119
  • 10 Sornes T. Umbilical cord knots.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 2000;  79 157-159
  • 11 Maher J T, Conti J A. A comparison of umbilical cord blood gas values between newborns with and without true knots.  Obstet Gynecol . 1996;  88 863-866
  • 12 Sepulveda W, Shennan A H, Bower S, Nicolaidis P, Fisk N M. True knot of the umbilical cord: a difficult prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  5 106-108
  • 13 Figo News. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet . 1987;  25 159-167
    >