Research priorities for australian critical care nurses: do we need them?
References (18)
- et al.
Developing specialty knowledge: the case of Australian critical care nursing
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
(2000) - et al.
Evidence based nursing: an examination of the role of nursing within the international evidence based health care practice movement
(1997) Cancer nursing research
Nursing Times
(1991)- et al.
Survey of knowledge for practice conference group discussion
Nursing Research
(1980) - et al.
A Delphi survey of clinical nursing research priorities
Journal of Advanced Nursing
(1982) - et al.
Research priorities for critical care nursing: a study by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
Heart & Lung
(1983) - et al.
Reviews and summaries of research related to AACN 1980 research priorities: clinical topics
American Journal of Critical Care
(1993) - et al.
Determining AACN's research priorities for the 90s
American Journal of Critical Care
(1993) - et al.
Clinical nursing research priorities in Australian critical care: a pilot study
Journal of Advanced Nursing
(1996)
Cited by (15)
A modified Delphi consensus study to identify UK osteopathic profession research priorities
2014, Manual TherapyCitation Excerpt :This allows professional development to take place in a rational manner to ensure that the progress of a profession is strategic (Marshall, 2004). Earlier work has also questioned the value of identifying research priorities compared to the actual research output delivered as a result of identifying such priorities (Marshall, 2004). Riegel et al. (1993) reviewed the priorities identified by Lewandoski and Kotsisky in their 1983 research priorities study, and found that little research had been conducted in several of the identified areas.
Analysis of NIC interventions in a neonatal intensive care unit
2013, Enfermeria ClinicaChartered Society of Physiotherapy's identification of national research priorities for physiotherapy using a modified Delphi technique
2012, Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)Citation Excerpt :The impact of defining research priorities in healthcare is not without dissent. Marshall found limited evidence to support research priorities having an effect on research output in the context of critical care nursing in Australia [17]. To ensure maximal effect, their recommendations included the identification of priorities in the context of their intended use.
A Delphi study on National PICU nursing research priorities in Australia and New Zealand
2012, Australian Critical CareInternational identification of research priorities for postgraduate theses in musculoskeletal physiotherapy using a modified Delphi technique
2010, Manual TherapyCitation Excerpt :Ten of the 20 Member Organisation countries of IFOMPT (in 2007) agreed to participate in the study with their potential participants responding, including: Australia, Austria, Canada, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, United Kingdom, and the United States of America. This sample and their working context also ensured that the priorities were identified in the context of their intended use (Marshall, 2004). The participants reflected the range of postgraduate programmes across countries with some established within universities and others working towards this goal.
Characterizing Citizens’ Preferences for Engagement in Patient Care and Research in Adult and Pediatric Intensive Care Units
2020, Journal of Intensive Care Medicine