Elsevier

Early Human Development

Volume 60, Issue 1, November 2000, Pages 13-24
Early Human Development

Non-nutritive sucking in the healthy pre-term infant

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(00)00091-8Get rights and content

Abstract

In the infant, sucking behaviour is one of the first coordinated muscular activities. It is under the control of the brainstem. In utero sucking is observed from 13 weeks’ gestation. The healthy full-term newborn infant has a very stable rhythm of alternating bursts of sucking with pauses in between. The non-nutritive sucking (NNS) patterns of 58 low-risk prematurely born infants (gestational ages between 26 and 35 weeks) were studied using a specially designed computer-based method that analyses and quantifies NNS. A total of 183 observations were analysed. The typical NNS pattern with bursts of sucking activity separated by quiescent periods was recorded in all infants studied and was already present before 30 weeks of gestation. A gradual change over time of their NNS was seen. With increased maturation the sucking activity, sucking frequency, amplitude and burst duration all increased, while the variability of the sucking frequency and the duration of the intervals between bursts declined. Post-menstrual age (PMA) was the dominant predictor of this result but gender, state of activity and weight also influenced it to some extent. Girls had more sucking activity and a higher sucking frequency than boys. State of activity affected the stability of the rhythm. The weight of the infant influenced both sucking activity and duration of separate bursts.

Introduction

Sucking is a fundamental behaviour in the newborn infant. It appears in the neonate in two different modes depending on whether it is nutritive or non-nutritive. Nutritive sucking is almost continuous while NNS is organized as a series of bursts separated by brief pauses [1], [2]. Also the rate is lower during nutritive sucking. Evidently we are dealing with different central organizations for sucking behaviour when speaking of the two modes [3]. In utero jaw movements are seen from week 11 and sucking and swallowing from week 13 [4]. In the prematurely born infant NNS-like activity has been described before 30 weeks of PMA [1], [5], [6]. From PMA 30 weeks and upwards, quantification of the sucking variables has shown that the ontogenesis of NNS is primarily dependent on maturation and little affected by post-natal age or feeding experience. With increased maturation the frequency of sucking within bursts increases, the number of bursts per min increases and the inter-burst variance of rate declines [1], [5]. Healthy, full-term infants can all elicit a very stable burst/pause NNS pattern [1], [7]. If non-nutritive sucking is not stimulated by pacifier or thumb sucking the ability for non-nutritive sucking in this very robust pattern disappears by 4–5 months of age. The burst/pause pattern is reported to again be present in some adult patients with degenerative cerebral diseases [3].

Non-nutritive sucking in the pre-term infant has been thought to lessen distress, decrease crying during painful activities and improve behavioural state, the states more optimal for feeding increase [8], [9], [10]. Accelerated maturation of sucking reflex and earlier readiness for bottle feeding is reported when pre-term neonates were given NNS opportunities during gavage feeding, the gastric motor function is stimulated and the digestion process facilitated, the weight gain becomes more rapid and discharge from hospital earlier [11], [12]. Oxygenation (TcPO2) is found to increase and heart rate has been reported to be at times increased and at times reduced during NNS in pre-term infants [13], [14].

Previous studies on quantifying the NNS-rhythm have been hampered by the necessity for time-consuming manual analysis of recordings and are therefore based on small numbers of observations.

The aim of the present study is to characterize and quantify the NNS pattern in a strictly selected, large group of pre-term infants without medical problems by an automated system for analysis. The influence on the NNS-pattern by the infants’ gestational age, post-natal age, sucking experience, and maturation (post-menstrual age) as well as gender will be analysed.

Section snippets

Subjects

Fifty-eight healthy premature infants of both sexes were studied. They were born at a gestational age from 26 to 35 weeks and had a birth weight within 2 S.D. of expected weight for age. Gestational age was determined from the date of the last menstrual period and from ultrasound verification at 15–16 weeks. The babies had no medical complications according to the criteria in Table 1. They were clinically stable when investigated. Some of the more immature babies needed supplementary oxygen. At

Methods

A specially designed automated system was used for the recording, identification and analysis of non-nutritive sucking [7].

Each infant uses his or her own pacifier (B290, Pigeon Corporation) during repeated recordings. A pressure transducer that detects and records pressure variations during sucking is located inside the pacifier. The pressures transmitted to the transducer are both from the compression of air in the nipple by lips, tongue and palate and from the oral negative pressure obtained

Statistics

As normal distribution of data was implied by normal probability plots for the major variables, (sucking activity, frequency, amplitude and intra-burst variability) parametric methods were used and the statistical package STATISTICA 99 applied. A forward stepwise multiple regression method was employed to decide the weight of the different independent values: recording number, gender, post-menstrual age (PMA), gestational age (GA), post-natal age (age), weight when recorded, state of activity

Results

All of the 58 infants examined showed the typical NNS pattern of alternating periods of sucking activity (bursts) separated by brief pauses. Eight recordings were from five infants who at the time were younger than PMA 29 completed weeks. One of these infants at 27 weeks showed just one burst. In the other seven recordings, multiple sucking bursts separated by pauses typical for NNS were seen, the earliest at PMA 27 weeks and 5 days.

On nine occasions (of a total of 183) no, or just one, sucking

Discussion

All healthy full-term infants are able to suck non-nutritively [1]. They have a rhythmical pattern characterised by alternating periods of sucking activity (bursts) and pauses in between. All our strictly selected pre-term infants without medical problems showed this regular sucking activity. However in less than 5% of the recordings there were less than two bursts. The possibility of not achieving a regular pattern was greater in the more immature infant and at their first observation.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from The Medical Faculty Göteborg University, The First of May Flower Foundation, The Freemason Orphanage Foundation, Sven Jerring Foundation, Göteborg Medical Society and Samaritan Foundation.

References (31)

  • J.A. DiPietro et al.

    Behavioral and physiologic effects of nonnutritive sucking during gavage feeding in preterm infants

    Pediatr Res

    (1994)
  • T. Field et al.

    Pacifying effects of nonnutritive sucking on preterm neonates during heelstick procedures

    Pediatrics

    (1984)
  • G.C. McCain

    Facilitating inactive awake states in preterm infants: a study of three interventions

    Nurs Res

    (1992)
  • J.C. Bernbaum et al.

    Nonnutritive sucking during gavage feeding enhances growth and maturation in premature infants

    Pediatrics

    (1983)
  • A.-M. Widström et al.

    Nonnutritive sucking in tube-fed preterm infants: effects on gastrin motility and gastric contents of somatostatin

    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr

    (1988)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text