Elsevier

The Journal of Pediatrics

Volume 111, Issue 5, November 1987, Pages 651-659
The Journal of Pediatrics

Original article
Early identification of children's special needs: A study in five metropolitan communities*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80238-XGet rights and content

In a study of special education programs in five urban school systems, parent interview data for 1726 children revealed how early the children's problems were identified and how the medical system was involved in the diagnosis. Problems included speech impairment, learning disabilities, emotional disturbance, mental retardation, sensory disorders, and physical and health disabilities. Overall, 4.5% of the children's problems were identified at birth, and only 28.7% before the age of 5 years. Variation in age at identification depended on the condition: 1 year for Down syndrome and cerebral palsy versus a 6-year range for mental retardation. Although physicians were most likely to identify the less common, more severe handicaps, they also identified from 15% to 25% of learning disabilities, speech impairments, emotional disorders, hyperactivity, and “other” development problems. The type, severity, and complexity of the condition were significant predictors of physician identification. No racial, socioeconomic, or site biases were associated with whether a physician was first to identify. Age at identification was predicted by the complexity of the problem, the association with other health and developmental concerns, socioeconomic indicators, and whether a physician was involved in the diagnosis. In the absence of clear assumption of responsibility for early identification, much terrain remains uncharted by medical practitioners and the schools. A better systematic sharing of responsibility for the early identification of developmentally disabling conditions is needed.

References (22)

  • MeierJH

    Screening, assessment, and intervention for young children at developmental risk

  • StranglerSR et al.

    Screening growth and development of preschool children

    (1980)
  • FrankenburgWK

    Increasing the lead time for the preschool aged handicapped child

  • FrankenburgWK et al.

    Early identification of children at risk

    (1985)
  • HaydenAH et al.

    Bases for early intervention

  • Lasting effects of early education: a report from the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies

    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev

    (1982)
  • SimeonssonR et al.

    A review and analysis of the effectiveness of early intervention programs

    Pediatrics

    (1982)
  • Clunies-RossGC

    Accelerating the development of Down's syndrome infants and young children

    J Spec Educ

    (1979)
  • DenhoffE

    Current status of infant stimulation programs for children with developmental disabilities

    Pediatrics

    (1981)
  • EganDF et al.

    Developmental screening 0–5 years

    Clin Dev Med

    (1969)
  • The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975

    Fed Reg

    (August 23, 1977)
  • Cited by (138)

    • Neurodevelopment and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, third edition (ASQ-3)

      2021, Diagnosis, Management and Modeling of Neurodevelopmental Disorders: The Neuroscience of Development
    • When Do Clinicians Decide to Screen Children for Mental Health-Behavioral-Developmental Delays/Disorders: Is it Time to Reconsider Policy Recommendations?

      2019, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      False-positive findings are thus useful for identifying children who may benefit from community early childhood programs (eg, Head Start,57 quality early education or childcare,4,5 parent training, Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting programs58) and evidence-based primary care interventions (Reach Out and Read,59 Video Interaction Project,60 Healthy Steps61). The findings from this and other studies18-21 should help the USPSTF to find the many benefits in screening. The USPSTF's concerns about potential harms often have less to do with the psychometric properties of screens but rather that some parents experience lingering distress over false-positive results.

    • Educational identification of students with serious emotional disability and/or autism spectrum disorder: how current practices perpetuate disproportionality

      2019, International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      Medical providers play an important role in alerting parents to developmental and behavioral concerns that represent a significant departure from normative expectations. Thus, inequities in access to preventative pediatric care and well-child visits can delay the identification of children with developmental and emotional disabilities (Flores and the Committee on Pediatric Research, 2010; Palfrey, Singer, Walker, & Butler, 1987). Educators and interventionists who do not share a common culture or heritage with a family are less likely to interpret developmental differences in the child as a within-child phenomenon, and may inaccurately attribute slow acquisition of skills to a cultural or linguistic difference that will resolve with acculturation (Hibel & Jasper, 2012).

    • Intellectual and Developmental Disability

      2018, Nelson Pediatric Symptom-Based Diagnosis
    • Intellectual and Developmental Disability

      2017, Nelson Pediatric Symptom-Based Diagnosis
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the Ambulatory Pediatrics Association, Anaheim, California, April 1987.

    Supported by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Commonwealth Fund.

    View full text