An analysis of potential biases in the loss of indigent infants to follow-up

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3782(88)90083-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Loss to follow-up is a major problem in indigent inner-city populations. We evaluated a large, well-described, inborn indigent population of high-risk infants (HRI) and control infants (CI) to assess possible selection biases in loss to follow up at one year adjusted age. Serial clinic visits, phone calls, and letters and payment of $20.00 for attending at 1 year was used to minimize patient loss. Yet, the 1 year loss rate was high, and among HRI, greater for ventilator-treated infants > 1500 g birthweight (71114; 62%) than for ventilator-treated very-low birthweight (VLBW; < 1500 g) infants (39108; 36%) or non-ventilated VLBW infants (62145; 43%) (P < 0.05). Multivariate analyses indicated that those lost to follow-up were at no greater risk of a poor outcome on the basis of prenatal and perinatal medical and socioeconomic findings than were those in the same risk group (HRI or CI) or subgroup of HRI who were examined at 1 year. In a review of hospital records, similar rates of hospitalization and neurologic problems during infancy were identified for HRI examined and HRI lost to follow-up. The identification of such morbidity during infancy may be less complete for HRI lost to follow-up than for those examined. Thus, the high frequency of deficits observed in follow-up evaluation of indigent HRI is unlikely to result from loss of unaffected infants.

References (26)

  • R. Fisch et al.

    Physical and mental status at 4 years of age of survivors of the respiratory distress syndrome

    J. Pediatr.

    (1975)
  • S. Fomon

    Infant Nutrition

  • T. Hirata et al.

    Survival and outcome of infants 501 to 750 gm: A six year experience

    J. Pediatr.

    (1980)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Follow-up at two years of age and early predictors of non-compliance in a cohort of very preterm infants

      2017, Early Human Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Social and health policies affecting maternal educational attainment, maternal health and income, and parental time disposition may be therefore important factors to take into consideration to improve attendance rates. Even though relationship between attrition and perinatal conditions are not consistently found in different studies [14,31–34], in our cohort, infants presenting high-risk birth characteristics such as a lower gestational age and birthweight, and SGA were more prone to attend evaluation. It was also the case for sicker infants during the neonatal course, as indicated by the higher rates of neonatal morbidities related to prematurity in attending infants.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by a grant (No. 1626) from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation awarded to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas.

    View full text