CLINICAL PRACTICEImportance of complete follow-up of spontaneous fetal loss after amniocentesis and chorion villus sampling
References (21)
- et al.
Complete follow-up in assessing fetal losses after chorion villus sampling
Lancet
(1990) - et al.
An evaluation of the chorionic villus sampling learning curve
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1990) - et al.
Spontaneous abortion rate and advanced maternal age: consequences for prenatal diagnosis
Lancet
(1990) - et al.
Results and effect of refusal recontact in a case-control study of ectopic pregnancy
Epidemiology
(1991) - et al.
Nonresponse and intensity of follow-up in an epidemiologic study of Vietnam-era veterans
Am J Epidemiol
(1991) Rights and wrongs: a validation study of the perinatal morbidity system
(1986)- et al.
Statistics with confidence
BMJ
(1990) - et al.
Evaluation of transcervical chorionic villus sampling with a completed follow-up of 1550 consecutive pregnancies
Prenat Diagn
(1989) - et al.
Cytogenetic findings in 1250 chorionic villus samples obtained in the first trimester with clinical follow-up of the first 1000 pregnancies
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
(1989) - et al.
Completed follow-up of 1000 consecutive transcervical chorionic villus samplings performed by a single operator
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
(1991)
Cited by (50)
Development of a High-Fidelity Simulator for Teaching Chorionic Villus Sampling
2018, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaCitation Excerpt :These and similar models have been developed to address concerns regarding the association between the number of CVS procedures performed by practitioners and their clinical outcomes. Halliday et al.17 found that those operators who had performed CVS more than 150 times over 3 years had patients with significantly lower miscarriage rates than did practitioners who performed fewer than 150 procedures. Similarly, Tabor et al.18 collected data from the National Danish Registry and concluded that the number of CVS and amniocentesis procedures performed by an institution and procedure-related miscarriage rates are inversely correlated.
Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies
2009, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :These factors dominate the risk for pregnancy loss in these high-risk groups, which makes the risk for amniocentesis-related pregnancy loss appear negligible (as seen in our study) or even protective.3 As was carefully pointed out by Halliday et al,13 to accurately estimate the fetal loss rate after the procedure requires complete follow-up. This is 1 of the greatest strengths of our study, along with the large sample size.
Parental karyotype and subsequent live births in recurrent miscarriage
2004, Fertility and SterilityPrenatal diagnosis of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection
2000, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :Recent studies have documented the possibility of severe symptomatic infection as a consequence of secondary infection, but its exact incidence has not yet been defined.23,24 Furthermore, the estimated risk of fetal loss as a result of amniocentesis is 0.2% to 1.3%, which may exceed the risk of fetal damage as a result of secondary infection.25 Finally, bearing in mind that the predictive value of a diagnostic test increases in line with the prevalence of the disease in the studied population, the selection of pregnant women with primary infection (and therefore high risk for fetal transmission) could increase the predictive value and consequent usefulness of the tests used for prenatal diagnosis.
Pregnancy Loss After Amniocentesis with Double-Needle Insertions in Twin Pregnancies
2022, Twin Research and Human GeneticsEvaluation of early and late complications of amniocentesis in ommolbanin hospital in Mashhad, Iran during 2014-2016
2018, Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility