Skip to main content
Log in

Case Series of Infants Presenting with End Stage Retinopathy of Prematurity to Two Tertiary Eye Care Facilities in Mexico: Underlying Reasons for Late Presentation

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe the characteristics of infants with bilateral Stage 4b or 5 ROP (i.e. with subtotal or total retinal detachment) who presented to eye departments in two major cities in Mexico, to identify reasons why they may have become blind in order to recommend how programs could be improved. A large case-series of infants with Stage 4b or 5 ROP in both eyes confirmed by ultrasound who attended the ROP Clinic, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara from September 2010 to November 2012, and the Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez from December 2011 to December 2012 were identified from the diagnostic databases of each hospital. Mothers of infants in Guadalajara had a telephone interview. 89/94 eligible infants were included in the study, 48 in Guadalajara and 41 in Mexico City. Cases came from 22 of the 32 states in Mexico. Half of the infants attending Guadalajara 24/48 (50 %) had been cared for in NICUs without ROP screening programs and were not examined. Among the 24 infants cared for in NICUs with ROP programs, 7/24 (29.1 %) mothers reported that their infant had not been examined while in the NICU, and a further 9/24 (37.5 %) were either not referred for screening after discharge or they did not attend. Two infants had failed laser treatment. Strategies and resources to prevent end stage ROP have not been firmly established in Mexico. There is an urgent need to expand the coverage and quality of ROP programs, to ensure that existing screening guidelines are better adhered to, and to improve communication with parents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilbert, C. E., Fielder, A., Gordillo, L., Quinn, G., Semiglia, R., Vinsintin, P., et al. (2005). International No-ROP group characteristics of infants with severe retinopathy of prematurity in countries with low, moderate, and high levels of development: implications for screening programs. Pediatrics, 115, 518–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blencowe, H., Lawn, J. E., Vazquez, T., Fielder, A., & Gilbert, C. (2013). Preterm-associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatric Research, 74(Suppl 1), 35–49.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Born too soon: The global action report on preterm birth. Available at: http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/news/2012/borntoosoon_chapter2.pdf. Accessed 30 Sep 2013.

  4. Gordillo, L., Villanueva, A. M., & Quinn, G. E. (2012). A practical method for reducing blindness due to retinopathy of prematurity in a developing country. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 40, 577–582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Quinn, G. E., Gilbert, C. E., Darlow, B. A., & Zin, A. (2010). Retinopathy of prematurity: An epidemic in the making. Chinese Medical Journal (England), 123, 2929–2937.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Darlow, B. A., Gilbert, C. E., & Quiroga, A. M. (2013). Setting up and improving retinopathy of prematurity programs: Interaction of neonatology, nursing, and ophthalmology. Clinics in Perinatology, 40, 215–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jalali, S., Anand, R., Kumar, H., Dogra, M. R., Azad, R., & Gopal, L. (2003). Programme planning and screening strategy in retinopathy of prematurity. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 51, 89–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zepeda-Romero, L. C., Barrera de Leon, J. C., Camacho-Choza, C., Gonzalez Bernal, C., Camarena-Garcia, E., Diaz-Alatorre, C., et al. (2011). Retinopathy of prematurity as a major cause of severe visual impairment and blindness in children in schools for the blind in Guadalajara city, Mexico. The British Journal of Ophthalmology, 95(11), 1502–1505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zin, A. A., Moreira, M. E., Bunce, C., Darlow, B. A., Gilbert, C. E., et al. (2010). Retinopathy of prematurity in 7 neonatal units in Rio de Janeiro: Screening criteria and workload implications. Pediatrics, 126, e410–e417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson, M. T., Wang, S. K., & Moshfeghi, D. M. (2013). A new paradigm for incorporating the joint statement screening guidelines for retinopathy of prematurity into clinical practice: Outcomes from a quaternary referral program. Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina, 44, 442–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Good, W. V. (2004). Early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity cooperative group. Final results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ETROP) randomized trial. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, 102, 233–250.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Palmer, E. A., Hardy, R. J., Dobson, V., Phelps, D. L., Quinn, G. E., & Summer, C. G. (2005). 15-year outcomes following threshold retinopathy of prematurity: Final results from the multicenter trial of cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity. Archives of Ophthalmology, 123, 311–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Manejo de la Retinopatía del Recién Nacido Prematuro. Lineamiento Técnico. México 2010. ISBN - 978-970-721-441-5. Available at: http://www.v2020la.org/docs/lineamiento/Lineamiento-ROP-SSA-2007.pdf. Data Accessed 2 July 2014.

  14. Gilbert, C. E., Fielder, A., Gordillo, L., Quinn, G. E., Semiglia, R., Vinsintin, P., et al. (2005). Characteristics of infants with severe retinopathy of prematurity in countries with low, moderate, and high levels of development: implications for screening programs. Pediatrics, 115, e518–e525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Diario Oficial de la Federación, Available at: http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5285817&fecha=25/01/2013. Data Accessed 15 June 2014.

  16. Darlow, B. A., Ells, A. L., Gilbert, C. E., Gole, G. A., Quinn, G. E., et al. (2013). Are we there yet? Bevacizumab therapy for retinopathy of prematurity. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 98, F170–F174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zepeda-Romero, L. C., Liera-Garcia, J. A., Gutiérrez-Padilla, J. A., Valtierra-Santiago, C. I., & Avila-Gómez, C. D. (2010). Paradoxical vascular-fibrotic reaction after intravitreal bevacizumab for retinopathy of prematurity. Eye (London), 24, 931–933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gutiérrez, J. P., & Hernández-Ávila, M. (2013). Cobertura de protección en salud y perfil de la población sin protección en México, 2000–2012. Salud Publica de Mexico, 55(2), S83–S90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Profit, J., Lee, D., Zupancic, J. A., Papile, L., Gutierrez, C., Goldie, S. J., et al. (2010). Clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of neonatal intensive care in Mexico. PLoS Medicine, 7(12), e1000379.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, M. B., Donovan, E. F., & Wagge, J. R. (2006). Race, gender, and clinical risk index for babies (CRIB) score as predictors of severe retinopathy of prematurity. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 10, 253–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah, P. K., Narendran, V., Kalpana, N., & Tawansy, K. A. (2009). Anatomical and visual outcome of stages 4 and 5 retinopathy of prematurity. Eye (London), 23, 176–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhende, P., Gopal, L., Sharma, T., Verma, A., & Biswas, R. K. (2009). Functional and anatomical outcomes after primary lens-sparing pars plana vitrectomy for Stage 4 retinopathy of prematurity. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 57, 267–271.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cusick, M., Charles, M. K., Agrón, E., Sangiovanni, J. P., Ferris, F. L, 3rd, & Charles, S. (2006). Anatomical and visual results of vitreoretinal surgery for stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity. Retina, 26, 729–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Urrets-Zavalia, J. A., Crim, N., Knoll, E. G., Esposito, F. A., Collino, E., Urrets-Zavalia, M. E., et al. (2012). Impact of changing oxygenation policies on retinopathy of prematurity in a neonatal unit in Argentina. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 96, 1456–1461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. INEGI resultados de encuesta nacional de ocupacion y empleo. www.inegi.org.mx/inegi/contenidos/espanol/prensa/comunicados/estrucbo/pdf.

  26. Yanovitch, T. L., Siatkowski, R. M., McCaffree, M., & Corff, K. E. (2006). Retinopathy of prematurity in infants with birth weight > or = 1250 grams-incidence, severity, and screening guideline cost-analysis. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 10(2), 128–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamholz, K. L., Cole, C. H., Gray, J. E., & Zupancic, J. A. (2009). Cost-effectiveness of early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics, 123(1), 262–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown, G. C., Brown, M. M., Sharma, S., Tasman, W., & Brown, H. C. (1999). Cost-effectiveness of treatment for threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics, 104(4), e47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunbar, J. A., Hsu, V., Christensen, M., Black, B., Williams, P., & Beauchamp, G. (2009). Cost-utility analysis of screening and laser treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 13(2), 186–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zin, A., Magluta, C., Pinto, M., Entringer, A., de Sousa Mendes Gomes, M., Lopes Moreira, M., & Gilbert, C. (2014). Retinopathy of prematurity screening and treatment cost in Brazil. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública = Pan American Journal of Public Health, 36(1), 37–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vinekar, A., Gilbert, C. E., Dogra, M., Kurian, M., Shainesh, G., Shetty, B., et al. (2014). The KIDROP model of combining strategies for providing retinopathy of prematurity screening in underserved areas in India using wide-field imaging, tele-medicine, non-physician graders and smart phone reporting. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 62, 41–49.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Quinn, G. E., Ying, G. S., Daniel, E., Hildebrand, P. L., Ells, A., Baumritter, A., et al. (2014). Validity of a telemedicine system for the evaluation of acute-phase retinopathy of prematurity. JAMA Ophthalmology,. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1604.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fijalkowski, N., Zheng, L. L., Henderson, M. T., Wallenstein, M. B., Leng, T., Moshfeghi, D. M., et al. (2013). Stanford university network for diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity (SUNDROP): Four-years of screening with telemedicine. Current Eye Research, 38, 283–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Photographic Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity (Photo-ROP) Cooperative Group, Balasubramanian, M., Capone, A, Jr, et al. (2006). The photographic screening for retinopathy of prematurity study (Photo-ROP): Study design and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Retina, 26, S4–S10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trese, M. T. (2008). What is the real gold standard for ROP screening? Retina, 28, S1–S2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luz C. Zepeda-Romero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zepeda-Romero, L.C., Meza-Anguiano, A., Barrera-de León, J.C. et al. Case Series of Infants Presenting with End Stage Retinopathy of Prematurity to Two Tertiary Eye Care Facilities in Mexico: Underlying Reasons for Late Presentation. Matern Child Health J 19, 1417–1425 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1648-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1648-z

Keywords

Navigation