Table 4

Predicting low maternal satisfaction with the newborn examination using the maximum likelihood logistic regression model

FactornCrude odds ratio (95% CI)Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
*p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001.
SHO, Senior house officer.
(A) Intention to treat
    Intention to treat (midwife v SHO)313/6450.54 (0.39 to 0.75)***0.82 (0.57 to 1.20)
    Healthcare issues discussed (yes)297/6450.43 (0.30 to 0.60)***0.49 (0.34 to 0.70)***
    Previous miscarriage (yes)135/6451.68 (1.14 to 2.48)**1.61 (1.08 to 2.40)*
    Newborn examination by midwife who clerked first antenatal visit (yes)95/6450.33 (0.18 to 0.58)***0.43 (0.23 to 0.81)**
(B) Actual treatment by SHOs v midwives
    Status of examiner (midwife v SHO)291/6450.56 (0.40 to 0.78)***0.91 (0.62 to 1.35)
    Healthcare issues discussed (yes)297/6450.43 (0.30 to 0.60)***0.48 (0.33 to 0.68)***
    Previous miscarriage (yes)135/6451.68 (1.14 to 2.48)**1.61 (1.08 to 2.40)*
    Newborn examination by midwife who clerked first antenatal visit (yes)95/6450.33 (0.18 to 0.58)***0.41 (0.22 to 0.77)**