Table 1

Studies on methods of weaning from mechanical ventilation

Extubation from low rate IPPV versus extubation after endotracheal CPAP
Kimet al (n = 27)7, Kimet al (n = 60)8, Tapiaet al (n = 87)9
Cumulative analysis10 Relative risk (RR) 0.10 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.78), risk difference (RD) −0.201 (95% CI, −0.319 to −0.083). The use of a period of ETT CPAP before extubation confers no advantage over direct extubation. Direct extubation from low rate IPPV is associated with increased chance of successful extubation
Conventional IPPV versus synchronised ventilation (PTV/SIMV)
Chan et al (n = 40)11, Donn et al (n = 30)12, Bernstein et al (n = 327)13, Chen et al (n = 77)14
Cumulative analysis15 Duration of ventilation noted to be shorter with either PTV or SIMV in all studies (weighted mean difference, 45.2 hours; 95% Cl −78.8 to −12.1)
PTV versus SIMV
Chan et al (n = 40)16, Dimitriou et al (n = 40)17
Cumulative analysis15 Duration of ventilation shorter with PTV than SIMV (weighted mean difference, 42.4 hours; 95% Cl, −9.6 to 94.4)
Volume controlled versus pressure limited ventilation
Sinha et al (n = 50)18, Piotrowski et al (n = 60)19
AnalysisDuration of weaning (mean time, 65.6 v 125.6 hours; p < 0.001) and duration of ventilation (mean time, 12.4v 161.9 hours; p < 0.001) shortened in volume controlled with fewer complications
Extubation to head box versus nasal CPAP
Engelke et al (n = 19)20, Higgins et al (n = 58)21, Chan et al (n = 60)22, So et al (n = 50)23, Annibale et al (n = 124)24, Tapia et al (n = 87)9, Davis et al (n = 92)25, Robertson et al (n = 58)26
Cumulative analysis27 Extubation to NCPAP leads to a lower “failure” rate but future studies required with refinement for gestational age and method of CPAP administration
  • CI, confidence interval; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; ETT, endotracheal tube; IPPV, intermittent positive pressure ventilation; NCPAP, nasal CPAP; PTV, patient triggered ventilation; SIMV, synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation.