Skip to main content
Log in

The light-flash-evoked response as a possible indicator of increased intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical treatment of infantile hydrocephalus by shunt implantation may result in suboptimal intracranial pressure. Major neurological impairments and death are usually prevented by shunt treatment, but minor sequelae may persist or develop. The introduction of adjustable shunts has improved the possibilities of optimizing shunt function and minimizing the risk of such impairments. However, it is still impossible to determine the intracranial pressure without invasive measurements. Clinical findings and procedures such as computed tomography (CT) are not always enough to allow a conclusion as to whether a child's signs and symptoms are the result of suboptimal intracranial pressure (shunt dysfunction) or are of another etiology. With the aim of reducing the number of invasive pressure measurements and CT scans, we investigated the effect of increased intracranial pressure on the visual evoked response (VER). Binocular light flash stimuli of supramaximal intensity were used and VER recordings were performed from Oz and Cz. The VER results from a group of 31 infants and children with hydrocephalus and 2 children with pseudotumor cerebri were compared with responses from a control group of 35 healthy children. The results show that a subpotential, P′ (P-prime), usually just preceding P1 (P100), has an increased latency (>96 ms) in all hydrocephalic children before surgery. The P′ latency in this group was usually even above 110 ms. The latencies of other VER potentials were also increased but not as consistently as P′. After surgical intervention the VER latencies decreased and usually normalized. The P′ latency in four children in the control group was just above the borderline latency, but was less than 110 ms. In the remaining 31 children the VER P′ latency was 96 ms or below. The VER provides information about the physiological condition of the visual system and seems to be related to intracranial pressure. The method was found to be useful in the clinical examination of hydrocephalic children. In addition, the VER may be used to monitor patients' clinical condition and the effect of treatment, e.g., in cases of pseudotumor cerebri or traumatic brain injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alani SM (1985) Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 62:234–237

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker RS, Carter D, Hendrick EB, Buncic JR (1985) Visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri in childhood. Arch Ophthalmol 103:1681–1685

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker RS, Baumann RJ, Buncic JR (1989) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri) in pediatric patients. Pediatr Neurol 5:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Connolly MB, James EJ, Cochrane DD (1991) Rapid recovery from cortical visual impairment following correction of prolonged shunt malfunction in congenital hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol 48:956–957

    Google Scholar 

  5. Constantini S, Umansky F, Nesher R, Shalit M (1987) Transient blindness following intracranial pressure changes in a hydrocephalic child with a V-P shunt. Child's Nerv Syst 3:379–381

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coupland SG, Cochrane DD (1987) Visual evoked potentials, intracranial pressure and ventricular size in hydrocephalus. Doc Ophthalmon 66:321–330

    Google Scholar 

  7. Creutzfeldt OD, Kuhnt U (1973) Electrophysiology and topographical distribution of visual evoked potentials in animals. In: Jung R (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 595–643

    Google Scholar 

  8. Faulhauer K, Schmitz P (1978) Overdrainage phenomena in shunt treated hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir 45:89–101

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fernell E, Hagberg B, Hagberg G, Wendt L von (1986) Epidemiology of infantile hydrocephalus in Sweden. I. Birth prevalence and general data. Acta Paediatr Scand 75:975–981

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fernell E, Hagberg B, Hagberg G, Hult G, Wendt L von (1988) Epidemiology of infantile hydrocephalus in Sweden. Current aspects of outcome in preterm infants. Neuropediatrics 19:143–145

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fernell E, Hagberg B, Hagberg G, Hult G, Wendt L von (1988) Epidemiology of infantile hydrocephalus in Sweden: a clinical study in children born at term. Neuropediatrics 19:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fernell E, Hagberg G, Hagberg B (1990) Infantile hydrocephalus — the impact of enhanced preterm survival. Acta Paediatr Scand 79:1080–1086

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fernell E, Gillberg C, Wendt L von (1991) Behavioural probelms in children with infantile hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 33:388–395

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fernell E, Gillberg C, Wendt L von (1991) Autistic symptoms in children with infantile hydrocephalus. Acta Paediatr Scand 80:451–457

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fernell E, Hagberg G, Hagberg B (1993) Infantile hydrocephalus in preterm, low-birth-weight infants — a nationwide Swedish cohort study 1979–1988. Acta Paediatr 82:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fernell E, Hagberg G, Hagberg B (1994) Infantile hydrocephalus epidemiology — a mirror of enhanced survival. Arch Dis Child 70:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guthkelch AN, Schlabassi RJ, Vries JK (1982) Changes in the visual evoked potentials of hydrocephalic children. Neurosurgery 11:599–602

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guthkelch AN, Schlabassi RJ, Hirsch RP, Vries JK (1984) Visual evoked potentials in hydrocephalus: relationship to head size, shunting and mental development. Neurosurgery 14:283–286

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hadenius A, Hagberg B, Hüttnäs-Bensch K, Sjögren I (1962) The natural prognosis of infantile hydrocephalus. Acta Paediatr Scand 51:117–118

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hagberg B, Sillanpää M (1970) Benign intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri). Acta Paediatr Scand 59:328–339

    Google Scholar 

  21. James H (1990) Spectrum of the syndromes of the isolated fourth ventricle in posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus of the preterm infant. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:305–308

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kraus N, Özdamar Ö, Heydemann PT, Stein L, Reed NL (1984) Auditory brain-stem responses in hydrocephalic children. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 59:310–317

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lary S, Vries LS de, Kaiser A, Dubowitz LMS, Dubowitz V (1989) Auditory brain stem responses in infants with posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. Arch Dis Child 64:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  24. McSherry JW, Walters CL, Horbar JD (1982) Acute visual evoked potential changes in hydrocephalus. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 53:331–333

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sjöström A, Abrahamsson M (1994) Patterned light flash evoked short latency activity in the visual system of visually normally normal and amblyopic subjects. Acta Ophthalmol 72:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sjöström A, Roos A, Uvebrant P (1993) The light flash evoked response in children with increased intracranial pressure and/or hydrocephalus (abstract). The 16th Annual Meeting of the European Neuroscience Association, Madrid. Neurosci Lett 6 [Suppl]: 375

  27. Sklar FH, Ehle AL, Clark WK (1979) Visual evoked potentials: a noninvasive technique to monitor patients with shunted hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 4:529–534

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sutton LN, Cho B, Jaggi J, Joseph PM, Bruce DA (1986) Effects of hydrocephalus and increased intracranial pressure on auditory and somatosensory evoked response. Neurosurgery 18:756–761

    Google Scholar 

  29. Uvebrant P, Sixt R, Bjure J, Roos A (1992) Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid shunt function in hydrocephalic children with 99m Tc-DTPA. Child's Nerv Syst 8:76–80

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vries LS de, Pierrat V, Minami T, Casaer P (1990) The role of short latency somatosensory evoked responses in infants with rapidly progressive ventricular dilatation. Neuropediatrics 21:136–139

    Google Scholar 

  31. York D, Legan M, Benner S, Watts C (1984) Further studies with a noninvasive method of intracranial pressure estimation. Neurosurgery 14:456–461

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sjöström, A., Uvebrant, P. & Roos, A. The light-flash-evoked response as a possible indicator of increased intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus. Child's Nerv Syst 11, 381–387 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717400

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717400

Key words

Navigation