Objective To evaluate whether the antenatal consultation for preterm labour worries or reassures women, and to identify factors contributing to these feelings.
Design This is a prospective survey study from April 2012 to September 2013. This mixed-methodology tool was co-constructed with patients and first tested in a single-centre pilot study.
Setting Three university-affiliated, tertiary care, high-risk obstetrics inpatient units in Quebec, Canada.
Participants Women hospitalised with threatened preterm labour between 26 and 32 weeks’ gestational age completed the survey within 72 hours of an antenatal consultation by neonatology. 341 women were invited to participate and 226 mothers completed the survey (72% response rate), at a median gestational age of 30 weeks.
Main outcome measures Participant worry, reassurance and change in perception after the antenatal consultation were the main outcome measures. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with these outcomes.
Results 23% of participants were worried by the consultation, and 87% were reassured by it. Lower gestational age and higher maternal education were associated with feeling worried (adjusted OR=0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99; and adjusted OR=2.15, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.44, respectively). Longer consultations were associated with reassurance (adjusted OR=8.21, 95% CI 2.67 to 25.26). Women were reassured by (1) feeling well informed about prematurity with optimistic outlooks, and (2) a trusting and reassuring expert neonatology team. High-quality interactions with neonatologists were associated with reassurance, while poorer communications were associated with feelings of worry.
Conclusions To be reassuring, neonatologists should strive to establish a trusting relationship with mothers, in which realistic and clear, but optimistic, information is offered.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors NG participated in the conception and design of the study, analysed and interpreted the data, drafted the manuscript, and has approved the manuscript as submitted. She had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
SN participated in the conception and design of the study, interpreted the data, revised the manuscript, and has approved the manuscript as submitted.
AB participated in the conception and design of the study, interpreted the data, revised the manuscript, and has approved the manuscript as submitted.
AP participated in the conception and design of the study, analysed and interpreted the data, drafted the manuscript, and has approved the manuscript as submitted.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval The institutional review boards of the three participating healthcare institutions approved this study.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.