Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Clinical evaluation of a novel adaptive algorithm for automated control of oxygen therapy in preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support
  1. Gemma K Plottier1,2,
  2. Kevin I Wheeler3,
  3. Sanoj K M Ali1,2,
  4. Omid Sadeghi Fathabadi4,
  5. Rohan Jayakar4,
  6. Timothy J Gale4,
  7. Peter A Dargaville1,5
  1. 1Department of Paediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  2. 2School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  3. 3Neonatal Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4School of Engineering and ICT, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  5. 5Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Peter Dargaville, Department of Paediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital, 48 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia; peter.dargaville{at}dhhs.tas.gov.au

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the performance of a novel rapidly responsive proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algorithm for automated oxygen control in preterm infants with respiratory insufficiency.

Design Interventional study of a 4-hour period of automated oxygen control compared with combined data from two flanking periods of manual control (4 hours each).

Setting Neonatal intensive care unit.

Participants Preterm infants (n=20) on non-invasive respiratory support and supplemental oxygen, with oxygen saturation (SpO2) target range 90%–94% (manual control) and 91%–95% (automated control). Median gestation at birth 27.5 weeks (IQR 26–30 weeks), postnatal age 8.0 (1.8–34) days.

Intervention Automated oxygen control using a standalone device, receiving SpO2 input from a standard oximeter and computing alterations to oxygen concentration that were actuated with a modified blender. The PID algorithm was enhanced to avoid iatrogenic hyperoxaemia and adapt to the severity of lung dysfunction.

Main outcome measure Proportion of time in the SpO2 target range, or above target range when in air.

Results Automated oxygen control resulted in more time in the target range or above in air (manual 56 (48–63)% vs automated 81 (76–90)%, p<0.001) and less time at both extremes of oxygenation. Prolonged episodes of hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia were virtually eliminated. The control algorithm showed benefit in every infant. Manual changes to oxygen therapy were infrequent during automated control (0.24/hour vs 2.3/hour during manual control), and oxygen requirements were unchanged (automated control period 27%, manual 27% and 26%, p>0.05).

Conclusions The novel PID algorithm was very effective for automated oxygen control in preterm infants, and deserves further investigation.

  • Neonatology
  • Respiratory
  • Intensive Care

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles