Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Continuous non-invasive cardiac output measurements in the neonate by electrical velocimetry: a comparison with echocardiography
  1. Shahab Noori1,2,
  2. Benazir Drabu2,
  3. Sadaf Soleymani1,3,
  4. Istvan Seri1
  1. 1Division of Neonatology and the Center for Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and the LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  2. 2Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
  3. 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Shahab Noori, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, MS# 31, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA; snoori{at}chla.usc.edu

Abstract

Objective Electrical velocimetry (EV) is a non-invasive method of continuous left cardiac output monitoring based on measurement of thoracic electrical bioimpedance. The objective was to validate EV by investigating the agreement in cardiac output measurements performed by EV and echocardiography.

Design In this prospective observational study, left ventricular output (LVO) was simultaneously measured by EV (LVOev) using Aesculon and by echocardiography (LVOecho) in healthy term neonates during the first 2 postnatal days. To determine the agreement between the two methods, we calculated the bias (mean difference) and precision (1.96×SD of the difference). As LVOecho has its own limitations, the authors also calculated the ‘true precision’ of EV adjusted for echocardiography as the reference method.

Results The authors performed 115 paired measurements in 20 neonates. LVOev and LVOecho were similar (534±105 vs 538±105 ml/min, p=0.7). The bias and precision of EV were −4 and 234 ml/min, respectively. The authors found the true precision of EV to be similar to the precision of echocardiography (31.6% vs 30%, respectively). There was no difference in bias and precision between the measurements obtained in patients with or without a haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus.

Conclusions EV is as accurate in measuring LVO as echocardiography and the variation in the agreement between EV and echocardiography among the individual subjects reflects the limitations of both techniques.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles