Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Work of breathing and volume targeted ventilation in respiratory distress
  1. Deena-Shefali Patel,
  2. Gerrard F Rafferty,
  3. Silke Lee,
  4. Simon Hannam,
  5. Anne Greenough
  1. Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, MRC Asthma Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, King's College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Anne Greenough, Newborn Unit, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK; anne.greenough{at}kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To determine the level of volume targeting (VT) associated with the lowest work of breathing (WOB) for prematurely born infants being ventilated with acute respiratory distress.

Design Prospective study.

Setting Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.

Patients 18 infants, median gestational age 29 (range 25–34) weeks, being ventilated for acute respiratory distress.

Interventions Infants were studied first without VT (baseline). Volume targeted levels of 4 ml/kg, 5 ml/kg and 6 ml/kg were then delivered in random order. After each VT level, the infants were returned to baseline. Each step was maintained for 20 minutes.

Main outcome measure The transdiaphragmatic pressure time product (PTPdi) as an estimate of the WOB.

Results The mean PTPdi was higher at a VT level of 4 ml/kg (median 154 cm H2O·s/min) compared to baseline (median 112 cm H2O·s/min) (p<0.001) and a VT level of 6 ml/kg (median 89 cm H2O·s/min) (p<0.001).

Conclusion A low level of VT increased the WOB in infants with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The authors' results suggest that, during acute respiratory distress, a VT level of at least 5 ml/kg rather than a lower level might avoid an increased WOB. The most appropriate level of VT needs to be determined in a randomised controlled trial with long-term outcomes.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding D-SP is supported by the Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust.

  • Competing interests AG has held grants from various ventilator manufacturers and received honoraria for giving lectures and advising various ventilator manufacturers.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the King's College Hospital Research Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.