Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Improved techniques reduce face mask leak during simulated neonatal resuscitation: Study 2
  1. Fiona E Wood (fewood{at}doctors.org.uk)
  1. The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
    1. Colin J Morley (colin.morley{at}rwh.org.au)
    1. Royal Women's Hospital, Australia
      1. Jennifer A Dawson (jennifer.dawson{at}rwh.org.au)
      1. The Royal Women's Hospital, Australia
        1. C. Omar Farouk Kamlin (omar.kamlin{at}rwh.org.au)
        1. Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
          1. Louise S Owen (louise.owen{at}rwh.org.au)
          1. Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
            1. Susan Donath (susan.donath{at}mcri.edu.au)
            1. Royal Children's Hospital, Australia
              1. Peter Graham Davis (pgd{at}unimelb.edu.au)
              1. Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

                Abstract

                Background: Techniques of positioning and holding neonatal face masks vary. Studies have shown that leak at the face mask is common and often substantial irrespective of operator experience.

                Aims: 1.To identify a technique for face mask placement and hold which will minimise mask leak. 2. To investigate the effect of written instruction and demonstration of the identified technique on mask leak for two round face masks.

                Method: Three experienced neonatologists compared methods of placing and holding face masks to minimise the leak for Fisher & Paykel 60mm and Laerdal size 0/1 masks. Fifty clinical staff gave positive pressure ventilation to a modified mannequin designed to measure leak at the face mask. They were provided with written instructions on how to position and hold each mask and then received a demonstration. Face mask leak was measured after each teaching intervention.

                Results: A technique of positioning and holding the face masks was identified which minimised leak. The mean (SD) mask leaks before instruction, after instruction and after demonstration were 55% (31), 49% (30), 33% (26) for the Laerdal mask and 57% (25), 47% (28), 32% (30) for the Fisher & Paykel mask. There was no significant difference in mask leak between the two masks. Written instruction alone reduced leak by 8.8% (CI 1.4% to 16.2%) for either mask; when combined with a demonstration mask leak was reduced by 24.1% (CI 16.4% to 31.8%).

                Conclusion: Written instruction and demonstration of the identified optimal technique resulted in significantly reduced face mask leak.

                • face mask
                • infant
                • neonatal resuscitation
                • newborn
                • resuscitation techniques

                Statistics from Altmetric.com

                Request permissions

                If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.