Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Geographically based investigation of the influence of very preterm births on routine mortality statistics from the United Kingdom and Australia
  1. david field (david.field{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk)
  1. university of leicester, United Kingdom
    1. Barbara Bajuk (barbara.bajuk{at}perinatal.usyd.edu.au)
    1. NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, NSW Pregnancy and Newborn Services Network, Unive, Australia
      1. Bradley N Manktelow (bm18{at}le.ac.uk)
      1. University of Leicester, United Kingdom
        1. Trina Vincent (tvincent{at}perinatal.usyd.edu.au)
        1. NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, NSW Pregnancy and Newborn Services Network, Unive, Australia
          1. Jon Stewart Dorling (jon.dorling{at}nuh.nhs.uk)
          1. Nottingham University Hospitals, United Kingdom
            1. William Tarnow-Mordi (williamtm{at}med.usyd.edu.au)
            1. Neonatology, Australia
              1. Elizabeth S Draper (msn{at}le.ac.uk)
              1. University of Leicester, United Kingdom
                1. David Henderson-Smart (dhs{at}perinatal.usyd.edu.au)
                1. University of Sydney, Australia

                  Abstract

                  Background Comparisons of national perinatal and neonatal mortality rates often neglect the underlying causes. This study assessed effects of very preterm births in the UK and Australia. Setting Two geographically defined populations: the former Trent Health Region of the UK and New South Wales (NSW) / the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia. Method All births 22+0 to 31+6 weeks born in 2000, 2001 and 2002 were identified by established surveys of perinatal care. Rates of birth and death were compared. Results The population of NSW/ACT was 35% higher and there were 66% more births than in Trent (273,495 vs 164,824). The proportion of liveborn infants between 22 and 31 weeks gestation was about 25% higher in Trent (NSW/ACT 2945, rate per 1000 livebirths 10.82 [95% C.I. 10.43-11.22]; Trent 2208, rate per 1000 livebirths 13.47 [95% C.I. 12.92-14.05]). The proportion of these infants admitted to a neonatal unit was also higher in Trent (91.2% vs 94.4%; OR 1.63; 95%CI 1.30-2.05). Unadjusted mortality in infants admitted to a neonatal unit was similar : NSW/ACT 332 / 2686 (12.4%), Trent 284 / 2085 (13.6%); unadjusted odds ratio = 1.12 (95% CI: 0.94-1.33) p = 0.21. Conclusion The higher rates of very premature birth and more ready admission to neonatal intensive care for those infants in the UK could help explain why its perinatal and neonatal mortality rates are higher than Australia's. Efforts to understand why the rate of premature birth in the UK is so high should be a national priority.

                  • infant mortality
                  • perinatal mortality
                  • prematurity

                  Statistics from Altmetric.com

                  Request permissions

                  If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

                  Linked Articles

                  • Fantoms
                    Ben Stenson