Article Text

PDF
Ultrasonically detectable cerebellar haemorrhage in preterm infants
  1. L K McCarthy1,
  2. V Donoghue2,
  3. J F A Murphy1
  1. 1Department of Neonatology, The National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  2. 2Department of Radiology, The National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lisa Kenyon McCarthy, Department of Neonatology, The National Maternity Hospital, Holles St, Dublin 2, Ireland; lmccarthy{at}nmh.ie

Abstract

Objective To determine the frequency and pattern of cerebellar haemorrhage (CBH) on routine cranial ultrasound (cUS) imaging in infants of ≤32 weeks gestation, and to investigate how extremely preterm infants with CBH differ from those with severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH).

Methods 672 infants of ≤32 weeks gestation were prospectively examined for CBH on serial cUS imaging. In a separate case–control analysis, the clinical features, ultrasound findings and outcome of preterm infants with CBH were compared to those of infants with isolated severe IVH (grade III–IV).

Results Nine cases of CBH were identified among 53 infants with severe IVH. The incidence of CBH in infants of ≤32 weeks gestation was 1.3%. Five infants had bilateral CBH involving both hemispheres, three had unilateral left sided CBH and one had a right hemispheric lesion. Infants with CBH were male, significantly more preterm (24.4 vs 27.0 weeks) and of lower birth weight (692 g vs 979 g). Vaginal births predominated in the CBH group (89% vs 50%). The median time to identification of haemorrhage for both groups was 3 days. Mortality in the CBH group was 100% (9/9) compared to 43% (19/44) in the severe IVH group.

Conclusions Extensive CBH in preterm infants is rare and devastating. It appears to be confined to very preterm, extremely low birthweight infants and may have a male predominance. The co-existence of severe IVH and extensive CBH on routine cot-side cUS in the early neonatal period is an ominous finding.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.