Article Text

PDF

Neonatal pneumonia in developing countries
  1. T Duke
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr T Duke
    Centre for International Child Health, University Department of Paediatrics, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia; trevor.dukerch.org.au

Abstract

Pneumonia contributes to between 750 000 and 1.2 million neonatal deaths and an unknown number of stillbirths each year world wide. The aetiology depends on time of onset. Gram negative bacilli predominate in the first week of life, and Gram positive bacteria after that. Streptococcus pneumoniae probably causes about 25% of neonatal pneumonia. Interventions that would reduce mortality from this condition would have a large range of beneficial effects: improved maternal health, better management of other common neonatal conditions, and reduced long term childhood and adult morbidity.

  • developing countries
  • pneumonia

Statistics from Altmetric.com

It is estimated that 3.9 million of the 10.8 million deaths in children annually world wide occur in the first 28 days of life.1 More than 96% of all neonatal deaths occur in developing countries, and pneumonia accounts for a substantial proportion of these. Intrauterine and early onset pneumonia was found at autopsy in 10–38% of stillborn and 20–63% of liveborn babies who subsequently died (with all but one of six studies in the range of 20–32%).2 In a separate series of 1044 autopsies on neonatal deaths in the first 48 hours of life, 20–38% had pneumonia, with the highest incidence in poorer socioeconomic groups.3 There are therefore likely to be between 750 000 and 1.2 million neonatal deaths annually where pneumonia is involved,4 and neonatal pneumonia accounts for 10% of global child mortality.

Throughout childhood, the greatest risk of death from pneumonia is in the neonatal period. In a field trial of community based management of childhood pneumonia in India, more than half of all child deaths from pneumonia occurred among neonates.5 Pneumonia mortality risk is strongly dependent on birth weight and age of onset. Case fatality rates are much higher for intrauterine or early onset pneumonia than for late onset neonatal pneumonia,6,7 and higher among low birthweight newborns.8

The proportion of neonatal respiratory distress that is caused by pneumonia will depend on where the source population is from (tertiary hospital, district hospital, or community), the stage in the perinatal period, the gestational age of the babies and the availability of intensive care, and the definition of pneumonia. Of 150 neonates with respiratory distress presenting to a referral hospital in India, 103 (68.7%) were diagnosed to have pneumonia.9 Using a different case definition in a teaching hospital in Brazil, of 318 infants presenting with respiratory distress within the first 4 days of life, bacterial infection was proven on culture in 31 (9.7%), and another 62 (19.5%) had radiographic signs of pneumonia.10

CLASSIFICATION AND PROBLEMS IN UNDERSTANDING THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF NEONATAL PNEUMONIA

Neonatal pneumonia can be arbitrarily classified as early and late onset. There are various definitions of early onset pneumonia; some authors have used 48 hours as a cut off, others have suggested 7 days. Because of the way some aetiology studies have been reported, and the differences in aetiology, it may be operationally useful to separate the disease classification between the first week of life and the subsequent three weeks. In most series, Gram negative bacteria predominate in the first week and Gram positive bacteria predominate subsequently.

Intrauterine pneumonia can be considered a subgroup of early onset disease; this presents as stillbirth, low Apgar scores, or severe respiratory distress at the time of birth and is commonly associated with chorioamnionitis. Intrauterine and early onset pneumonia is acquired by transplacental spread or from aspiration of infected amniotic fluid after prolonged rupture of membranes or during delivery. Intrauterine pneumonia also occurs in the setting of a systemic infection in the mother, such as rubella, cytomegalovirus, Treponema pallidum, Listeria monocytogenes, tuberculosis, and HIV. These infections may be asymptomatic in the mother. Associated features include hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and jaundice.

Pneumonia acquired from bacterial infection of amniotic fluid or colonisation of the birth canal is often associated with chorioamnionitis and evidence of fetal asphyxia. How asphyxia relates to pneumonia is not certain, but it can cause fetal gasping and aspiration of contaminated amniotic fluid. That pneumonia occurs from aspiration is supported by the common finding of amniotic fluid debris or maternal leucocytes in the histological examination of the lungs.

It can be difficult to distinguish early onset pneumonia from hyaline membrane disease; the clinical picture and radiographic appearance can be identical, and in many settings radiology and bacteriology are unavailable. Gestational age and onset of symptoms provide clues in many cases. However, hyaline membrane disease also occurs close to term (in infants of diabetic mothers, and rarely surfactant protein deficiency), intrauterine acquisition of infection often results in premature onset of labour, and gestational age assessments are often not possible in settings where antenatal care is minimal and health workers are not trained in this type of clinical scoring. Therefore basing treatment decisions for respiratory distress in the newborn on estimated gestational age is impractical and unsafe. The difficulty in distinguishing pneumonia from hyaline membrane disease and other non-infective respiratory conditions of the newborn—for example, transient tachypnoea of the newborn—presents a problem in understanding the contribution of pneumonia to mortality in the first week of life.

The literature on the bacterial aetiology of neonatal pneumonia is influenced by studies that include nosocomial infection in neonatal intensive care units.11,12 Many studies do not report the age of onset. A further difficulty is that blood cultures will underestimate the proportion of pneumonia that is bacterial, and lung puncture studies have rarely been performed on neonates.3,6 In Ethiopia, a diagnosis of pneumonia in young infants was negatively associated with bacteraemia, compared with the diagnoses of clinical sepsis, “severe disease”, or “eventually fatal sepsis”.13 In studies where a high proportion of infants have previously received antibiotics, the highest yield has come from the combination of blood culture, lung puncture culture, and serum and lung aspirate latex agglutination antigens.14

The multi-country World Health Organisation young infant study has provided the most useful data yet on the aetiology of community acquired neonatal sepsis, including pneumonia from a range of developing countries. However, this study predominantly recruited young infants from outpatient departments in hospitals. This limited the number of neonates recruited from, or soon after, birth; thus intrauterine pneumonia and early onset pneumonia, which present in the first 48 hours of life, was not as well represented.

The following assumptions may be valid. The epidemiology of neonatal pneumonia and implications for treatment and prevention are sufficiently similar to those of neonatal bacteraemia, meningitis, and other forms of sepsis that blood culture and cerebrospinal fluid isolates can be used to understand the aetiology, notwithstanding the underestimation of pneumonia disease incidence without lung aspirates. Data on the aetiology of chorioamnionitis can be used to understand the aetiology of intrauterine and early onset pneumonia.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A definition of neonatal pneumonia was proposed in one Indian study (shown in the box),9 but none have been prospectively validated. This complex algorithm has limited application: at best in tertiary settings and as a standardised research tool. In most health facilities, laboratory testing, and often radiology, are unavailable.

In primary and many secondary healthcare facilities, it is sensible to consider neonatal pneumonia within the spectrum of neonatal sepsis. For practical purposes, WHO does not distinguish between neonatal pneumonia and other forms of severe sepsis, such as bacteraemia or urinary tract infection. There is much overlap in clinical signs and organ involvement, and empirical treatment regimens are similar.

Studies that have evaluated the clinical signs of radiographically proven neonatal pneumonia have reported some consistent and some apparently contradictory findings (table 1). Tachypnoea is present in 60–89% of cases. Chest recession is present in over 80% of cases in most studies, although one6 found that subcostal and intercostal retractions were only present in 36% of cases. Cough was absent in about two thirds of cases in two studies,6,14 but in less than 20% of cases from one study.6 For the purposes of designing primary care treatment strategies, Singhi and Singhi15 suggested that the standard definition for neonatal pneumonia could be “cough and chest wall recession” or “a history of rapid breathing and chest wall retraction”. Use of cough and respiratory rate >50 breaths/min as the definition would have missed radiographically proven pneumonia in 25% of the cases in their series.

Table 1

 Sensitivity (%) of clinical signs for radiographically diagnosed pneumonia in neonates in developing countries

Definition of neonatal pneumonia used in one Indian study9

A neonate with respiratory distress (any of: rapid, noisy, or difficult breathing; respiratory rate >60/min; chest retractions; cough; grunting) who has: (a) a positive blood culture or (b) any two or more of the following:

  1. Predisposing factors

    • – Maternal fever (>38°C)

    • – Foul smelling liquor

    • – Prolonged rupture of membranes (>24 hours)

  2. Clinical picture of sepsis

    • – Poor feeding

    • – Lethargy

    • – Poor reflexes

    • – Hypothermia or hyperthermia

    • – Abdominal distension

  3. Radiograph suggestive of pneumonia (nodular or coarse patchy infiltrate, diffuse haziness or granularity, air bronchogram, lobar or segmental consolidation); radiological changes not resolved within 48 hours

  4. Positive sepsis screen (any of the following):

    • – Bands >20% of leucocytes

    • – Leucocyte count out of reference range

    • – Raised C reactive protein

    • – Raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate

FACTORS PREDICTING EARLY ONSET PNEUMONIA

Predictive factors may be absent from many neonates with early onset pneumonia. A study of neonates in the United Kingdom with early onset pneumonia found that risk factors were present in 78%, but in almost half (17 of 35) the only predictor was early onset of labour.16 In India, only 40% (42 of 103) of mothers of neonates with pneumonia had identifiable risk factors: fever, prolonged rupture of membranes (>24 hours), leaking amniotic fluid, or foul smelling liquor.9 A problem with the methodology of the latter study is that known risk factors are used as one criterion to define pneumonia (box), therefore investigation of the proportion of neonatal pneumonias with these factors is a circular argument. Nevertheless, in this study from India, >50% of neonates with an eventual diagnosis of pneumonia had no known predisposing factors. This suggests that other criteria used to diagnose pneumonia in this study were non-specific, and the proportion of neonatal respiratory distress that was ascribed to pneumonia (68%) is an overestimate, or that some predisposing factors for neonatal pneumonia are difficult to recognise.

AETIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Intrauterine pneumonia

In an investigation of the aetiology of chorioamnionitis and perinatal infection, cultures of lung puncture and aspirate were carried out on 755 neonates who were stillborn or died in the first 72 hours of life.3 Table 2 lists the bacteria isolated.

Table 2

 Yield from cultures of lung puncture on 755 neonates who were stillborn or died in the first 72 hours of life3

Early onset neonatal pneumonia

Early onset neonatal pneumonia results from infection acquired by aspiration after early rupture of membranes or during labour, or an initially lower grade intrauterine infection associated with maternal chorioamnionitis (but not of a magnitude sufficient to cause death or severe respiratory distress at birth). Table 3 lists the bacterial causes found in studies from developing countries that clearly distinguished early from late onset neonatal sepsis and pneumonia. Escherichia coli, group B Streptococcus, Klebsiella spp, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae were the most commonly isolated bacteria. In a further study that did not make a clear distinction between early and late causes, among 150 Indian neonates presenting at a median of 164 hours of life with respiratory distress, of whom 103 were diagnosed with pneumonia, blood cultures were positive in 49 cases (48%): Klebsiella in 28, Staph aureus in seven, coagulase negative Staphylococci in seven.9

Table 3

 Cause of early neonatal sepsis and pneumonia in developing countries

Late onset neonatal pneumonia

Late onset neonatal pneumonia needs to be distinguished from pulmonary oedema secondary to a congenital heart lesion, and rarely from other pathology such as pulmonary haemorrhage or infarct. To understand the aetiology of late onset, community acquired neonatal pneumonia there is a need to exclude series from neonatal units in Western countries, where colonisation of endotracheal tubes and breaches in local immunity lead to bacteria entering the lower respiratory tract. Until the WHO young infant study,8,13,17,19 the aetiology of community acquired, late onset neonatal infection in developing countries had not been widely studied. Table 4 lists the major pathogens isolated from blood cultures or cerebrospinal fluid in neonates aged 7–29 days in this study and in a study from Kenya. Bacterial isolation in the WHO study was from blood cultures, cerebrospinal fluid, pus swabs, and conjunctival swabs. Given that more than half of all childhood bacterial pneumonias are not associated with bacteraemia, this series of studies is likely to have underestimated the proportion of neonatal pneumonias that are bacterial in origin.

Table 4

 Bacterial pathogens isolated from blood culture or cerebrospinal fluid in 1313 neonates aged 7–29 days in the multi-centre WHO young infant study,17 and in 260 neonates 8–30 days in Kenya

Two lung aspirate studies from India (table 5) have highlighted the importance of Gram positive bacteria in neonatal pneumonia: one study found S pneumoniae (14 out of 50) and Staph aureus (14 out of 50) to be the most common causes of neonatal pneumonia.6 A second study found S pneumoniae antigen positive in serum or lung aspirate of 10 of 44 (22%) neonates with pneumonia (but no cultures of S pneumoniae were positive), and Gram negative bacilli were cultured in 11 of 44 (25%).14 The age of onset of infection in these two studies was not reported, but in a study of neonates with pneumococcal sepsis in the United States, the median age of onset was 18.9 days (SD 4.6). For those in whom pneumonia was the major site of infection, the age of onset was 12.3 days (SD 12.4).20 The yield from these two lung aspirate studies, one of which also used non-culture techniques, was 62% compared with less than 10% in other studies that relied on blood and cerebrospinal fluid bacterial cultures alone.

Table 5

 Lung aspirate studies in neonatal pneumonia

Atypical pathogens

Congenital syphilis is still a major cause of neonatal infection in many developing countries, and fatal cases are invariably associated with severe pneumonitis and hypoxaemia (pneumonia alba). In a study from Papua New Guinea,21 congenital syphilis was the cause of death in 13.5% (17 of 126) neonates, and the case fatality rate for congenital syphilis was 33%.22 Severe hypoxaemia was common.23 In Malawi, independent risk factors for neonatal death included maternal syphilis (hazard ratio 2.4; 95% confidence intervals 1.3 to 4.4), low birth weight, and first pregnancy.24

Chlamydia trachomatis may contribute substantially to late onset neonatal pneumonia in countries where untreated sexually transmitted infections are common. The evidence for this is circumstantial, but suggestive of a major effect. In Papua New Guinea, evidence of C trachomatis was found by direct immunofluorescence in 22% (138 of 638) of nasopharyngeal aspirates from young infants presenting to an outpatient’s department. Positive C trachomatis nasopharyngeal aspirates were found in 33% (100 of 303) of infants with severe pneumonia, 18% (38 of 217) of those with non-severe pneumonia, and 9% (26 of 295) of young infants with no pneumonia, sepsis, meningitis, or conjunctivitis. The presence of Chlamydia was associated with radiographic evidence of pneumonia as well as hypoxaemia, and there was a borderline association of positive C trachomatis nasopharyngeal aspirates and pneumococcal bacteraemia.25 Recovery rates were high (>85%) despite antibiotics against Chlamydia being rarely used, suggesting either that Chlamydia predisposes, perhaps by mucosal injury, to secondary bacterial infection, which is more serious in the setting of co-infection, but still responds adequately to conventional antibiotics or Chlamydia responds sufficiently to commonly used antibiotics for young infant sepsis.

Among Kenyan neonates aged 7–30 days with pneumonia, 24 of 52 (46%) had the combination of both interstitial pneumonia and colonisation of the upper airways with C trachomatis.26 In Ethiopia, of 202 infants <3 months of age presenting to an outpatient’s department, 32 (15.8%) had a nasopharyngeal aspirate positive for C trachomatis.13

On the basis of pooled results from 10 studies, the estimated risk of Chlamydia pneumonia developing in an infant whose mother is colonised with C trachomatis is 7% (95% confidence interval 5.1% to 9.4%).27 The two largest cohort studies of infants exposed to C trachomatis reported pneumonia incidences of 3%28 and 16%.29 No studies have used the optimum method for determining the cause of pneumonia: isolation of C trachomatis from a percutaneous lung aspirate.

Apart from intrauterine infections, the viral aetiology of neonatal pneumonia has not been systematically studied. Respiratory syncitial virus has been shown to be a common pathogen in infants under 6 months of age,30,31 and it is likely that this virus is an important cause of seasonal late onset neonatal pneumonia in some settings in developing countries.

HIV and neonatal pneumonia

There are several reasons why HIV infection is a risk factor for the development of neonatal pneumonia and increases the risk of mortality from the latter. Although HIV infection usually becomes manifest clinically in later infancy, a rapidly progressive congenital form of HIV associated with persistent pneumonia in the neonatal period has been described from South Africa and Zimbabwe.32,33 This is associated with hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, prematurity, and growth retardation. Co-infection with tuberculosis, syphilis, and cytomegalovirus are common and may be responsible for the early manifestations of this disease.32,34 Maternal HIV infection increases the probability of death from neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and predisposes to sepsis from streptococci and staphylococci.33 Among mothers and infants in Pune, India using cow, goat, or buffalo milk as a substitute for human milk to reduce the risk of mother to child HIV transmission, the rate of hospital admission in the neonatal period from pneumonia (and other infections) was much higher than for the neonates of HIV positive mothers who breast fed.35

ROLE OF HYPOXAEMIA IN NEONATAL PNEUMONIA

Hypoxaemia is a common complication of neonatal illness, because of primary respiratory disease (pneumonia, hyaline membrane disease, transient tachypnoea of the newborn) and because apnoea is a common non-specific response to sepsis, hypothermia, and hypoglycaemia. There have been few investigations of the incidence of hypoxaemia in neonatal illness in developing countries. The incidence varies with the level of health facility. Hypoxaemia was present in 38.5% of infants under 2 months of age presenting to a tertiary hospital emergency department in India (Spo2 <90)36 and in 43% of neonates admitted to a provincial hospital in Papua New Guinea (Spo2 <86%, more than 2SD below the population mean at 1600 m).23 In Papua New Guinea, hypoxaemia was present in 77% of neonates with pneumonia, but also in 36% of neonates without clinically definable acute lower respiratory tract infection.23 Because of referral of more seriously ill infants, a higher proportion of neonates seen at tertiary hospitals than at primary care facilities will have hypoxaemia. However, hypoxaemia is a common feature of neonatal illness even in primary care facilities. Among infants less than 2 months of age presenting to eight remote rural primary health centres in Papua New Guinea, one or more signs of severe respiratory compromise were present in 25% (128 of 511): fast respiratory rate (102); severe chest indrawing (74); cyanosis (35); or apnoea (32). Each of these signs was associated with an increased risk of death. Pulse oximetry was not performed in this study; however, 49 infants (9.6%) had cyanosis or apnoea, two of the most specific clinical signs for neonatal hypoxaemia.23 Detection of hypoxaemia in neonates using clinical signs is difficult. In a study in Papua New Guinea, cyanosis was the most sensitive sign, but will still miss up to one quarter of neonates with hypoxaemia. A respiratory rate within the normal range of 30–60 breaths/min was found in just over half of all neonates with hypoxaemia. Incidences of hypoxaemia of 10% in primary care facilities and more than 30% at hospitals of first referral represent huge numbers globally, and need for oxygen is rarely matched by available resources.

OUTCOME

Table 6 summarises published case fatality rates in community based and hospital based studies, most of which come from India. Mortality in early neonatal pneumonia is much higher (74% and 29% in the two series that reported case fatality rate by age) than for late onset disease. Risk factors for death from neonatal pneumonia are early onset disease, hypoxaemia, low birth weight,6,8,14 and absence of tachypnoea (table 7).

Table 6

 Reported case fatality rates for neonatal pneumonia

Table 7

 Data showing that absence of tachypnoea is a risk factor for mortality

TREATMENT

There are no published randomised treatment trials of neonatal pneumonia, and few for neonatal sepsis in developing countries.37,38 Empirical treatment decisions must therefore be based on local resistance patterns and the costs, benefits, and availability of various antibiotic regimens. There are also some informative trials using retrospective or contemporaneous non-randomised control groups in communities and hospitals in developing countries.

Antibiotics

For the management of neonatal sepsis, WHO recommends giving ampicillin (50 mg/kg) every 12 hours in the first week of life and every eight hours from 2–4 weeks, plus a single daily dose of gentamicin.39 First line alternatives to ampicillin are benzylpenicillin or amoxicillin, and alternatives to gentamicin are kanamycin or streptomycin. Where there is strong evidence of staphylococcal infection (skin pustules, cellulitis, umbilical cord infection, pneumatocoeles, or empyema), cloxacillin or flucloxacillin, where these are available, should be substituted for ampicillin.

A daily dose regimen for gentamicin was piloted in a randomised trial in Kenyan infants less than 3 months of age. A regimen that consisted of a loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/kg (if weight <2 kg) or 4 mg/kg (if weight >2 kg) in the first week of life, or 4 mg/kg (weight <2 kg) or 6 mg/kg (weight >2 kg) resulted in a higher proportion of initial gentamicin concentrations within the therapeutic range and a lower rate of potentially toxic gentamicin concentrations, than a three times a day dose schedule.37

Pus, from empyema or skin pustules, should be examined after Gram staining, where laboratory facilities are available. The yield from blood cultures is low, and culture facilities will not be available in most health centres and secondary referral hospitals where neonates present with pneumonia, but where possible blood for culture should be taken before antibiotics are given, to guide second line antibiotic treatment in the event of treatment failure.

For neonates who are failing to respond to first line antibiotics, WHO suggests changing to chloramphenicol or a third generation cephalosporin.39 Chloramphenicol should not be used in premature infants, and should be avoided in the first week of life.

Antibiotic resistance among neonatal pathogens is increasing world wide. Reported rates of resistance depend partly on the proportion of cases that are acquired in hospitals, where multiresistant Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Serratia, and other enteric Gram negative bacilli are more common than in community acquired sepsis.11,40 Gentamicin resistance among Gram negative bacteria causing neonatal sepsis range from; 20% in Kenya;41 24% in India;14 43% in one study from Pakistan42 and 78–84% in another;43 66% in Papua New Guinea;40 and 77% in Guatemala.11 Despite high rates of reported resistance, the combination of ampicillin and gentamicin is still probably optimal first line treatment for severe community acquired neonatal pneumonia in most settings.

Community based recognition and treatment

Training village health workers to recognise the clinical signs of neonatal pneumonia has been shown to reduce total and pneumonia mortality in several projects in remote areas. A meta-analysis of five studies of community based trials from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tanzania, and Nepal showed a pooled reduction in total mortality of 27% (95% confidence interval 18% to 35%) and a reduction in pneumonia mortality of 42% (95% confidence interval 57% to 22%).44

Antibiotics used in these studies included oral cotrimoxazole (for five days),5,45 procaine penicillin, and oral ampicillin. Investigators in India who originally used cotrimoxazole with substantial reductions in neonatal mortality,5,45 later used cotrimoxazole with a daily dose of gentamicin with apparently additional benefit.46

In these non-randomised community trials, supervision and community motivation was very high. There is a need to know if this approach can be translated to other developing countries.

Oxygen and supportive care

Major improvements to neonatal outcomes can occur by standardising provision of neonatal care in rural and district hospitals. In the Eastern Highlands of Papua New Guinea, where general improvements were made to neonatal care (better provision of oxygen, detection and treatment of apnoea, thermoregulation, detection and treatment of hypoglycaemia, protocols for the safe use of intravenous fluids, and improved nutrition), case fatality from pneumonia was more than 50% lower during a 30 month period after the interventions compared with the 30 months before.47 Mortality also fell from other causes, particularly low birth weight, emphasising the values of a syndromic approach and general supportive measures rather than a diagnosis specific approach to neonatal care. These improvements occurred while WHO standard antibiotic treatment regimens were used throughout the two periods of study, and apart from oxygen and pulse oximetry did not require any intensive technologies.

Using oxygen, on the basis of objective evidence of hypoxaemia, has the potential for large reductions in neonatal and child mortality.48 Various methods are available for delivering oxygen, particularly cylinders of compressed gas and oxygen concentrators. Oxygen cylinders are costly and heavy to transport, but can be used anywhere. Oxygen concentrators are more cost effective in places remote from oxygen supply systems, but require a continuous power supply. A system of using concentrators with a cylinder as a back up in case of power failure may be optimal in rural hospitals in developing countries.

Appropriate attachments for delivering oxygen have recently been reviewed;49 in resource limited settings, use of nasal oxygen prongs is optimal but often limited by cost and availability. They do not require humidification, and low flow rates (0.5–2 litres/min) are effective in correcting hypoxaemia in most infants. A nasopharyngeal catheter is the most efficient method for delivering oxygen, providing the highest partial pressure of alveolar oxygen for a given flow rate; however, these are associated with higher complication rates than nasal prongs and do require humidification. A nasal catheter, inserted half way into the nasal passage, may be the most widely used method in developing countries: low flow rates are adequate, complications are rare, cost is a fraction of that of nasal prongs, and, where oxygen catheters are unavailable, nasogastric tubes are often used. Giving oxygen through a tube directed into a head box is inefficient in health facilities where oxygen supplies are limited. High flow rates (>4 litres/min) are required to achieve a high fraction of inspired oxygen and to avoid carbon dioxide accumulation within a standard neonatal head box.

Many neonates with severe pneumonia will be unable to feed well in the acute stage of the illness and require nasogastric or intravenous fluids. Although there are no randomised trials to inform fluid management, in infants with bronchiolitis, free water excretion is noticeably reduced in the acute stage compared with during convalescence, suggesting activation of water conservation mechanisms. In animal models of pneumococcal sepsis, free water excretion is reduced to 25% of baseline values within hours of infection. Hyponatraemia is found in about 30% of cases of pneumonia in some series, is associated with high antidiuretic hormone secretion, and is more common in children with cyanosis,50 suggesting that the more severe the pneumonia, the better the physiological water conservation, and the less exogenous fluid required to maintain homoeostasis. Giving fluid by a nasogastric tube allows the continuation of breast milk feeding and maintenance of some energy intake, avoidance of hypoglycaemia and the complications of intravenous fluid administration, and is cheaper than intravenous fluids. This is preferred unless there is a true contraindication to feeding, such as frequent vomiting, intolerance of enteral feeds, or high risk of aspiration. In these circumstances, isotonic saline plus up to 10% dextrose run at lower than traditional maintenance rates may be most appropriate, and feeds introduced as soon as the contraindication to enteral feeding has resolved.51

PREVENTION

There are several reasons why interventions that can only be delivered in hospitals will make little impact on deaths from neonatal pneumonia. In many societies, neonates are not taken outside the home, even if they are sick, so referral to a hospital is impossible. Often there is a preference for traditional village remedies. In addition, because the signs of severe illness can be very subtle in neonates, parents may not recognise that their infant is sick until it is too late, and geographical and financial constraints make referral to hospital very difficult for much of the world’s population. On the other hand, interventions solely at community level will not fully address the often fatal complications of hypoxaemia and apnoea. Improving supportive care and the safety and accessibility of hospitals for seriously ill newborn babies is a high priority globally. A comprehensive approach to prevention and treatment of neonatal pneumonia would therefore involve interventions at community level, in primary health facilities, and in district and tertiary hospitals.

Some preventive interventions have been shown to lead to improved outcomes. Other interventions have shown efficacy in research or atypical circumstances, and there is a need to evaluate the feasibility in other settings. For some preventive interventions and treatment, there are sound reasons for further investigation of their potential role.

PREVENTIVE MEASURES SHOWN TO BE EFFECTIVE

Active management of preterm rupture of membranes

Antibiotic administration after preterm rupture of membranes is associated with a delay in delivery and a reduction in major markers of neonatal morbidity (neonatal infection, use of oxygen therapy, and abnormal cerebral ultrasound scans).52 Encouraging treatment and referral of mothers with preterm rupture of membranes would reduce the number of babies born with intrauterine and early onset pneumonia.53

Promotion of basic newborn care in communities

Early and exclusive breast feeding has been shown to decrease the risk of pneumonia in infants outside the neonatal period, and there is every reason to expect a similar or greater protective effect against late onset neonatal pneumonia.54,55

Prevention of nosocomial pneumonia

Nosocomial pneumonia accounts for a large proportion of deaths from late onset pneumonia in industrialised countries and in developing countries with neonatal intensive care units. In these environments, infections due to enteric Gram negative bacilli (particularly Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Pseudomonas), coagulase negative staphylococci, and, in some units methicillin resistant Staph aureus are common.56–58 Infections occur because of colonisation of endotracheal tubes, humidifier apparatus, ventilator tubing, and intravenous lines, and is transmitted by hands of clinical staff and on other equipment (stethoscopes, etc). The single most important intervention for infection control for protecting newborns from nosocomial sepsis is hand washing.59,60 In addition, randomised trial evidence suggests that restricted antibiotic policies prevent nosocomial infections in neonates. In a multicentre randomised control trial, penicillin and tobramycin for early onset sepsis, and flucloxacillin and tobramycin for late onset sepsis resulted in much lower incidence of colonisation with resistant bacteria than the combination of ceftriaxone and amoxycillin.61 A regimen avoiding the use of amoxycillin and third generation cephalosporins restricts the resistance problem. Prevention of infection also requires the identification and cleaning of contaminated equipment.

APPROACHES WARRANTING FURTHER INVESTIGATION

Maternal immunisation

Giving pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine to mothers provided protective antibodies in newborns against S pneumoniae in the Philippines, Papua New Guinea, Bangladesh, and the Gambia.62–65 Antibodies are acquired through both the maternal-fetal circulation and breast milk.64 In the Gambia, pneumococcal antibodies were found to disappear rapidly during the first months of life; so, to achieve sustained protection, maternal vaccination would need to be supplemented by infant vaccination, and breast feeding promoted. In Papua New Guinea, there was evidence that vaccine response was not suppressed in older infants whose mothers had been vaccinated during pregnancy. Given the finding from limited lung aspirate studies that 25% of neonatal pneumonia is due to Pneumococcus, even protection in the first few months of life may be extremely beneficial, and the full potential of maternal immunisation should be fully explored.66 The possibilities increase for maternal immunisation, as more potential vaccine candidates become available, including herpes simplex, cytomegalovirus, and HIV vaccines.67

Prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections

Programmes to prevent and treat syphilis, Chlamydia, and HIV would substantially improve neonatal outcomes and reduce much of the neonatal respiratory disease caused by these infections. In a Kenyan maternity hospital, an antenatal treatment programme for syphilis based on rapid plasma reagin testing significantly improved pregnancy outcomes.68 However, tackling this issue is logistically difficult in countries where antenatal care is not accessed by most women, and where laboratory facilities in remote health clinics are absent or limited. Accurate rapid testing would have more utility than laboratory based serological tests, but rapid test kits are often expensive, of variable sensitivity, and field trials in developing countries are few. In South Africa and rural Gambia, the rapid plasma reagin test had positive predictive value (for subsequent confirmation of syphilis by laboratory based serological testing) of around 50%, and sensitivity around 75%.69,70 Other rapid tests may have greater predictive power, but are more costly. Retesting in pregnancy may be required in some settings.71 There is an urgent need for further evaluation of rapid screening tests for use in health clinics.

Cleansing the birth canal with antiseptic solution

In a non-randomised controlled trial in Malawi, cleansing the birth canal with 0.25% chlorhexidine at every vaginal examination before delivery was associated with a lower rate of admissions for neonatal sepsis, lower mortality from infectious causes and lower overall neonatal mortality, and lower maternal postpartum infection rate, than when no cleansing was done.72

Vitamin A supplementation at birth

Two large randomised trials have shown that vitamin A supplementation at birth reduces young infant mortality.73,74 Giving 24 000 IU vitamin A on day 1 and day 2 of life in India resulted in a 22% reduction in total mortality at 6 months of age; the greatest impact was in the period 2 weeks to 3 months of age, and in those of birth weight <2000 g. A possible reason for this is reduced S pneumoniae colonisation in early infancy. Within this large randomised control trial, nasopharyngeal colonisation with Pneumococcus was less common at 4 months of age.75 In another trial in Indonesian newborn, the risk of death was 64% lower (95% confidence interval 13% to 84%), and the incidence of cough and fever were significantly lower in the first 4 months in those who were given 50 000 IU vitamin A on the first day of life. This may shift the age of first infection to later in infancy when mortality will be less, therefore there are major implications for the timing of the first dose of vitamin A in supplemental programmes.

Management of apnoea and respiratory failure

Apnoea is a common complication of neonatal pneumonia, occurring in 28–43% of cases,6,76 and respiratory failure unresponsive to oxygen invariably precedes a fatal outcome. In some hospitals, provision of mechanical ventilation may do more harm than good because staff are not experienced with its use, or because the combination of poor infection control practices and colonised endotracheal tubes means that nosocomial pneumonia will cause the deaths of more babies than mechanical ventilation would save. Underwater bubble continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)77 may have a role in the management of apnoea or severe respiratory failure in these settings. One non-randomised study, used either nasopharyngeal CPAP or head box oxygen in neonates less than 1200 g and less than 28 weeks gestation who were “refused admission” to a neonatal intensive care unit, and found a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge in those who received CPAP.76 This study was very small (21 babies in total), and few conclusions can be drawn either about the benefits (survival of 45% v 20% in the control group) or the potential harms (intraventricular haemorrhage in 45% of the treatment group compared with 0 in the controls) of CPAP. Relatively inexpensive methods of delivering underwater bubble CPAP are now available and warrant trials in moderate sized hospitals in developing countries. CPAP may reduce the need for oxygen in hospitals where monitoring of oxygen toxicity is not feasible.

There is also evidence that in low birthweight neonates with apnoea, respiratory stimulants such as aminophylline or caffeine may be more effective than CPAP in preventing the need for mechanical ventilation,78 more effective than kinaesthetic stimulation in prevention of apnoea,79 and that caffeine is associated with fewer adverse events than aminophylline and is equally effective in the prevention of apnoea.80 Most studies have been conducted in preterm babies whose predominant pathology is hyaline membrane disease or apnoea of prematurity. Whether these drugs are beneficial for pneumonia in preterm and term babies has not been established in controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The global burden of neonatal pneumonia is huge. Efficient interventions must be targeted at all levels of the health services and communities. Unlike for pneumonia in older infants and children, where effective interventions against two bacteria (S pneumonia and H influenzae) will substantially reduce disease prevalence, the aetiology of neonatal pneumonia is more complex. Interventions that will reduce mortality from neonatal pneumonia will be broad based and have a range of general positive effects: improved maternal health, better management of other common neonatal conditions, and reduced long term childhood and adult morbidity. Rising rates of resistance to affordable antibiotics may mean that case fatality rates from neonatal pneumonia will increase in developing countries, emphasising the need to explore widely applicable preventive and treatment measures.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.