Responses

Download PDFPDF
Postnatal weight loss in term infants: what is “normal” and do growth charts allow for it?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Improving the neonatal weight chart
    • T J Cole, Professor of medical statistics

    Dear Editor

    Wright and Parkinson show that by 5 days post-partum, weight is on average 50g less than at birth. This highlights a deficiency of current growth charts, which display weight increasing steadily with age. On the British 1990 chart for example, weight at 5 days is about 150g greater than at birth, a net discrepancy of 200g or two-thirds of a centile channel.

    The obvious solution, to redraw...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Postnatal weight loss in term infants: what is "normal" and do growth charts allow for it?

    Dear Editor,

    In their study Drs Wright and Parkinson report that breast fed infants showed less postnatal weight gain compared to formula-fed infants and were significantly more likely to lose more than 10% of their birth weight.[1] They comment that this trend was no longer significant after adjustment for birth weight, which was significantly higher in breast fed infants. I wonder if adjusting for birthweight is act...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Postnatal weight loss in term infants: to correct for birthweight or not.

    Dear Editor,

    In their study Drs Wright and Parkinson report that breast fed infants showed less postnatal weight gain compared to formula-fed infants and were significantly more likely to lose more than 10% of their birth weight. [1] They comment that this trend was no longer significant after adjustment for birth weight, which was significantly higher in breast fed infants. I wonder if adjusting for birthweigh...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.