Objective: To assess various aspects of visual function at school age in children with neonatal cerebral infarction.
Patients and methods: Sixteen children born at term, who had cerebral infarction of perinatal onset on neonatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were assessed using a battery of visual tests. This included measures of crowding acuity (Cambridge Crowding Cards), stereopsis (TNO test), and visual fields. The results of the visual assessment were compared with the type and the extent of the lesion observed on neonatal MRI.
Results: Only six of the 16 children (28%) had some abnormalities of visual function on these tests. Visual abnormalities were more common in children with more extensive lesions involving the main branch of the middle cerebral artery and were less often associated with lesions in the territory of one of the cortical branches of the middle cerebral artery. The presence of visual abnormalities was not always associated with the involvement of optic radiations or occipital primary visual cortex. Abnormal visual fields were only found in children who also developed hemiplegia.
Conclusions: Abnormality of visual function is not common in children who had neonatal infarction and, when present, tends to be associated with hemiplegia and more extensive lesions.
- magnetic resonance imaging
- school age
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Recent population based data report an incidence of neonatal cerebral infarction of 1 in 4000 term infants.1 There have been several reports that these lesions are not always associated with an abnormal outcome, but most only assessed motor and language sequelae.2–4 Less attention has been paid to visual outcome. Most studies have only reported abnormal visual function in children with cerebral infarction who developed hemiplegia.5,6
In 1996 we reported a short term visual follow up in a cohort of infants with neonatal cerebral infarction,7 including infants with both normal and abnormal motor outcome. Using a battery of tests specifically designed to evaluate visual function in the first year of life, we showed that, whereas acuity and ocular movements were always normal, visual fields and visual attention (tested by saccadic shifts of fixation between targets) were abnormal in about 50%. We also found that not all the infants in whom involvement of the structures of the visual pathway was found on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) developed abnormal visual function. Half of the infants with involvement of the optic radiation had abnormal fields, and only 50% of the infants with parietal lobe lesions had an abnormal fixation shift in the first year of life. These findings suggested that other pathways and areas in the immature brain to some extent, compensated for early lesions affecting the visual pathway.
No systematic study has been performed to assess visual function at school age, when more mature aspects of visual function, such as stereopsis and crowding acuity, can be assessed.
The aim of this study was to assess various aspects of visual function at school age in children who suffered neonatal cerebral infarction and to examine the correlation between vision and (a) the type and extent of the infarction, and (b) the results of the early visual assessments performed in the first year of life.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
This study is part of a continuing longitudinal study aimed at evaluating the maturation of visual function in full term infants with focal perinatal infarction. Permission for the study was obtained from both the Royal Postgraduate Medical School and the University College ethics committee. Informed consent was obtained from parents in each case.
The children recruited in this study were born at, or referred soon after birth to, the Hammersmith Hospital, London in the period October 1991 to October 1996. As part of this study all infants who suffered neonatal cerebral infarction had early and serial brain MRI in the first year of life and, since April 1993, were also referred to the Visual Development Unit of University College London in the first months of life for serial assessments of visual function. Four children who were also found to have cerebral infarction on neonatal MRI and were assessed at school age but did not attend the visual development unit in the first year of life were also included in the study.
Magnetic resonance imaging
MRI was performed using a Picker 1.0T HPQ system using T1 and T2 weighted spin echo and age related inversion recovery sequences in the transverse plane. All the infants had serial imaging in the neonatal period and at least at 6 and 12 months of age. Lesions were recorded by the consensus of two observers looking for the location and extent of the infarction. The infarcts were classified according to the arterial distribution of the lesions. This was based on the location, extent, and shape of the lesions.8,9
Infarcts were characterised as being in the territory of the main arteries or in a borderzone distribution. The infarcts in the territory of the middle cerebral artery were further subdivided according to whether they occurred in the territory of the main branch or in one of the cortical branch arteries.
The scans were also assessed for involvement of the primary visual cortex and optic radiation.
Assessment of visual function
Early visual assessment
This was evaluated by using the Atkinson battery of child development for examining functional vision (ABCDEFV),10 which includes among its “core” vision tests assessment of orthoptic status (ocular movements, pupil response), acuity (tested using preferential looking), visual fields, and fixation shift. Details of the early assessment in this cohort have been published.7
Visual assessment at school age
Acuity and crowding ratio
The Cambridge crowding cards were used to obtain a measure of binocular crowding acuity. This gives an equivalent measure in children to adults testing with standard Snelling linear charts, and best reflects visual functioning in everyday life rather than monocular or single letter acuity.11 In this test, letters are presented, both alone on the cards (single optotype) and surrounded by four other letters which are half a letter width away (crowded optotype). Each child was tested on the single before the crowded optotype. When crowded optotypes were shown, only the central letter had to be identified. They were tested monocularly and binocularly.
The child was tested at a distance of 3 m and asked to name or match the letter shown. If the response was correct, the tester showed a card with decreased letter size and continued until the child was unable to correctly identify the central letter. As the aim of this study was not to identify refractive errors but to evaluate possible cerebral visual impairment by measure of crowding, children with known refractive errors were tested using their prescription glasses.
A maximum of three letters of each size was shown. The third letter was shown only if in the previous two trials using the same size one letter had been correctly identified and one had not. The result of the third letter was the deciding one: if the score was 2 out of 3, then the tester proceeded to a smaller letter; if the score was 1 out of 3, then the test ended and the last letter size where the criterion of 2 out of 3 was reached taken as the measure of acuity.
The results of the single and crowded optotype were compared and their ratio calculated by dividing acuity for crowded by acuity for single optotypes. According to our normative data,11,12 and in agreement with previous studies,13,14 the crowding effect was considered abnormal when the ratio was equal to or greater than 2.
This was tested using the TNO test, a test specifically designed for screening for defects of binocular vision.15 The test consists of seven three dimensional images (plates) of increasing difficulty. Plates I to IV provide a quick and easy way to establish whether stereopsis is present at all, and plates V to VII enable a quantitative assessment of stereoscopic sensitivity. According to age specific normative data, stereopsis was classified as absent if the children did not pass any plates, weak if some of the first five (240 s/arc) were passed, and normal when at least plate VI was completed (60 s/arc).
These were tested by gradually moving a small white ball (a Stycar ball of 40 mm in diameter) from 90° laterally towards the child’s midline. The child was asked to indicate when they first saw the ball. Eye movements of the child were also observed to estimate the angle of the visual fields and their symmetry. The findings were compared with age specific normative data. According to these data, the extent of visual fields develops during the first years of life, and the right and left sides of the binocular visual fields extend from about 30° at birth to 90°, reaching values similar to those for adults by the end of the first year.16–18
Sixteen children with neonatal cerebral infarction were assessed at between 5.5 and 7 years of age. Ten had a normal motor outcome, and six had hemiplegia.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Table 1 shows details of the side and extent of the lesion on the MRI scans performed after the first week of life.
Thirteen children had an arterial infarction in the territory of the middle cerebral artery, involving the main branch in four of the 13 and one cortical branch in the other nine. The remaining three children had a borderzone lesion.
Twelve of the 16 children had an early visual assessment in the first year of life. Table 2 shows details of the findings.
Acuity, tested by preferential looking, was normal in all 12, but seven of the 12 had abnormal visual fields, associated with abnormal fixation shift in six of the seven.
Details of the early assessment in 10 of the 12 have been published.7
Assessment at school age
Table 3 shows details of the assessment of visual function at school age.
Acuity and crowding ratio
Twelve children showed normal results (3/3), assessed on both single and crowded optotype. The crowding ratio was always below two. Two children had myopia and had abnormal results on both single optotype and crowding cards, and two had normal results on single optotype but abnormal results on the crowding cards, with a ratio above 2.
Fourteen children showed normal results (≥60 seconds of arc), and two had weak stereopsis. One of the two had difficulties in understanding the task. In the other subject the abnormal stereopsis was associated with strabismus.
Comparison of visual and MRI findings
Figures 1 and 2 show details of the association between visual abnormalities and different types of neonatal cerebral infarction.
Five children showed involvement of the primary visual cortex and/or the optic radiations on MRI. Two had abnormal fields, one strabismus, and the other two had normal visual function (tables 1 and 2).
Comparison of visual and motor outcome
Figure 3 shows details of the association between visual abnormalities and motor outcome. Ten children had normal motor outcome and six developed hemiplegia. Normal and abnormal visual function could be observed in both groups but abnormal visual fields were only found in children with hemiplegia.
Comparison of early and late visual assessments
Figure 4 shows details of early and late assessments in the 12 children who were assessed in the first year of life and at school age.
We assessed visual function at school age in children who were found to have cerebral infarction on neonatal MRI. Only six of 16 children (28%) had some abnormality of visual function assessed (acuity, stereopsis, visual fields, and eye movements), and four of the six showed abnormalities on only one of these tests.
Visual acuity was abnormal in four of the 16 children studied, but two of the four had abnormal results on both single optotype and crowding and were found to have a refractive uncorrected error. The other two children had normal results when tested with single optotype but had an abnormal crowding ratio, suggesting that the poor acuity results from cerebral visual impairment rather than ocular problems. High crowding ratios are also characteristic of amblyopia, but this explanation is unlikely for cases such as these where the effect was found in each eye and in binocular.
Visual fields were asymmetrical in two of the 16 children studied. The assessment of visual functions performed, however, only gives a broad estimate of the extent of visual fields. Other techniques such as the perimeter developed by van Hof-van Duin et al18 would have probably detected more subtle abnormalities of visual fields than the assessment used here. Nevertheless, our assessment can still reliably detect children who would have a significant restriction of visual fields that may affect their everyday life. Surprisingly, when we correlated the results of the assessment performed in the first year of life and at school age, we found that six of the seven children with abnormal visual fields in the first year of life had normal fields when tested at school age. This difference may partially be explained by the sensitivity of the assessment at school age. However, an alternative explanation may be the different techniques used to assess the two age groups. In the first year it is difficult to test visual fields without initially attracting the attention of the infant to the midline using a coloured toy. The extent of the visual fields is then tested by assessing the response of the infant’s eyes and head to a stimulus presented at the periphery. This technique is also used in other tests to assess visual fields such as the van Hof perimeter. The infant is required to disengage his/her attention from a central to a peripheral stimulus, a task requiring the integrity of other cortical areas involved in shift of visual attention. This is a similar “disengage” process to that required for the fixation shift paradigm. A deficit in disengagement has been linked to parietal lobe functioning in Balint’s syndrome19 and in infants who have undergone hemispherectomy.20 Interestingly all six children who had abnormal fields in the first year of life which normalised by school age showed parietal lesions on MRI with sparing of the optic radiations and primary visual cortex. Five of the six also had abnormal fixation shift in infancy. The only child who showed persistent field abnormalities also had optic radiation involvement and had shown normal results on fixation shifts. These findings suggest that problems indicated by field testing in infancy should not be taken as prognostic indicators of long term field defects, although it is possible that they reflect attention mechanisms that manifest in a different form in later childhood.
The prevalence of abnormal visual fields in our cohort (12.5%) was apparently lower than that reported in two previous studies reporting abnormal visual fields in 30% and 50% of children with neonatal cerebral infarction.5,6 Those studies, however, only included children who had hemiplegia, whereas we included all the children who had neonatal infarction irrespective of their motor outcome. When we looked at the incidence of abnormal visual fields in children with hemiplegia in our cohort, this was similar to the previous studies (33%). Hemiplegia has also recently been found to be associated with more subtle deficits of global motion perception in school age children.21
The relatively low prevalence of abnormal visual findings in our cohort may partly be explained by the type and extent of the lesions. More extensive lesions involving the main branch of the middle cerebral artery were more often associated with abnormal visual findings than localised lesions in the territory of one of the cortical branches of the middle cerebral artery (75% v 32%). The presence and severity of visual impairment, however, did not always depend on the involvement of the optic radiations and/or occipital visual cortex, which are more often affected in patients with more extensive lesions. This was also confirmed by the low association of abnormal visual findings and borderzone lesions, which were always associated with involvement of the optic radiations.
It is of interest that in this study the presence of unilateral basal ganglia lesions was not always associated with abnormal visual function. These findings are at variance with what has previously been reported in children with bilateral basal ganglia lesions, who always showed severe and bilateral abnormalities of visual function.22,23
In conclusion, we found that abnormality of acuity, visual fields, and stereopsis are not common in children who had neonatal infarction and, when present, tend to be associated with hemiplegia and more extensive lesions. Further studies are in progress to assess in more detail other aspects of visual function, such as visual attention and defects of spatial cognition, as suggested by the early abnormal results on fixation shifts in these children.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.