Article Text


Multidrug resistant neonatal sepsis in Peshawar, Pakistan
  1. S Rahman1,
  2. A Hameed1,
  3. M T Roghani1,
  4. Z Ullah2
  1. 1Department of Pediatrics, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
  2. 2Pakistan Medical Research Council, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr S Rahman, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK;


Objective: To investigate the spectrum of organisms causing neonatal sepsis in Peshawar, Pakistan and to assess their sensitivity to various groups of drugs.

Methods: Blood taken from newborn babies admitted to the special care baby unit at the Khyber Teaching Hospital with a clinical diagnosis of neonatal sepsis was cultured. The data obtained from October 1997 to December 2000 were analysed and the results tabulated.

Results: A total of 1598 blood cultures were taken; 1003 were positive (positivity rate 62.8%). Escherichia coli was the most common organism found (36.6%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (29.5%), Pseudomonas (22.4%), Klebsiella (7.6%), and Proteus (3.8%). No group B streptococcus was grown. Listeria monocytogenes was found in one cerebrospinal fluid culture. E coli and Pseudomonas showed a high degree of resistance to commonly used antibiotics (ampicillin, augmentin, and gentamicin), a moderate degree of resistance to cephalosporin (cefotaxime, ceftzidime, and ceftrioxone), and low resistance to drugs not used for newborn babies (ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and enoxabid). S aureus showed a low resistance to all three groups of antibiotics.

Conclusion: Neonatal sepsis remains one of the leading causes of neonatal admission, morbidity, and mortality in developing countries. Gram negative organisms are the major cause of neonatal sepsis in Peshawar. Such organisms have developed multidrug resistance, and management of patients infected with them is becoming a problem in developing countries.

Statistics from

Neonatal sepsis is one of the most common reasons for admission to neonatal units in developing countries.1,2 It is also a major cause of mortality in both developed and developing countries.2–5 The spectrum of organisms that cause neonatal sepsis changes over time and varies from region to region. It can even vary from hospital to hospital in the same city. This is due to the changing pattern of antibiotic use and changes in lifestyle. Gram negative organisms were the most common cause of neonatal sepsis in Europe and America in the 1960s. It changed to group B streptococcus during the 1970s and coagulase negative Staphylococcus during the late 1980s and 1990s. In most of the developing countries, Gram negative organisms remain the major cause of neonatal sepsis, particularly early onset neonatal sepsis.1,4–10 These organisms have developed increasing multidrug resistance over the last two decades,8,9,11 due to the indiscriminate and inappropriate use of antibiotics, over the counter sale of antibiotics, lack of legislation to control their use, poor sanitation, and ineffective infection control in the maternity services.12 The rapid emergence of multidrug resistant neonatal sepsis in developing countries is a new potential threat to the survival of newborn babies, who are often already in a poor condition.


This was a prospective study carried out in the special care baby unit of the Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, which is a 1100 bed teaching hospital acting as a tertiary care centre for the rest of the province. More than 70% of admissions to the unit are outborn. The annual number of admissions is about 1700 per year. Sepsis accounts for almost 40% of the admissions. Babies with a clinical diagnosis of neonatal sepsis were enrolled in this study. Babies who had received antibiotics before admission or had surgical problems, chromosomal and congenital anomalies, or dysmorphism were excluded.

Blood was taken by a standard method and cultured in the microbiology laboratories of Pakistan Medical Research Council, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar. Sensitivity to various antibiotics was tested by a standard disc diffusion technique.


Blood culture results obtained from October 1997 to December 2000 were analysed. Of a total of 1598 blood cultures, 1003 were positive (positivity rate of 62.8%): 367 (36.6%) were positive for Escherichia coli, 296 (29.5%) for Staphylococcus aureus, 225 (22.4%) for Pseudomonas, 77 (7.6%) for Klebsiella, and 38 (3.8%) for Proteus. No group B streptococcus was grown from any culture, and Listeria monocytogenes was grown from one cerebrospinal fluid culture.

The pattern of sensitivity of these organisms was analysed for three groups of antibiotics:

  1. penicillins and aminoglycosides, which are used as first line antibiotics;

  2. cephalosporins, which are used as a second line antibiotics;

  3. quinolones, which are not recommended for use in children less than 4 years of age, but may be indicated if the child has blood culture positive severe sepsis and the organism is not sensitive to any other antibiotic.

Table 1 shows the pattern of sensitivity of E coli, S aureus, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella sp, and Proteus to various antibiotics. Considerable resistance to first line antibiotics, moderate resistance to cephalosporins, and low resistance to quinolones was observed.

Table 1

Pattern of resistance to various antibiotics


About five million neonatal deaths occur world wide every year, 98% of which occur in developing countries, particularly Asia and Africa. Infections such as tetanus, pneumonia, septicaemia, meningitis, and diarrhoea account for 30–50% of neonatal deaths in developing countries.13 Neonatal sepsis is a life threatening emergency and any delay in treatment may result in death.14

The spectrum of organisms causing neonatal sepsis in our study is similar to that reported for other neonatal units in developing countries, with Gram negative organisms being responsible for most cases, particularly early onset. Almost 70% of episodes of neonatal sepsis in our unit are caused by Gram negative organisms, with E coli being the most common (36.6%) and Pseudomonas the second most common (22.4%). A similar pattern has been reported for the Children's Hospital, Lahore.9 In that series, Gram negative organisms were responsible for almost 80% of episodes of neonatal sepsis, with E coli being the most common (45.8%) followed by Klebsiella (17.2%) and Pseudomonas (16.2%). Bhutta and Yusuf4 reported that Klebsiella was the most common cause of neonatal sepsis in Karachi, Pakistan. Joshi et al,8 from India, reported Gram negative sepsis in 67.2% of their cases, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa being the most common organism (38.3%) followed by Klebsiella (30.4%) and E coli (15.6%). Similar patterns have been reported in Trinidad5 and Southern Israel.6

S aureus was the second most common organism in our study. Anwer et al1 found Gram positive organisms to be the main cause of neonatal sepsis in a teaching hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Gram negative organisms were responsible for almost half of the episodes of early onset neonatal sepsis in their series. Similar results have been reported by Dawodu et al2 and Kilani and Basamad10 for Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Group B streptococcus was not isolated from any culture in our series. The same has been reported in most of the studies from Pakistan and other developing countries.1,2,4,8,9 Ghiorgis,15 in his study from Ethiopia, did not find any group B streptococcus. On the other hand, in the series reported by Robbilard et al16 from Guadeloupe, group B streptococcus was grown from 46% of positive blood cultures, and 52% of gastric aspirates were positive for group B streptococcus. In Al Wasl Hospital, Dubai, Koutouby and Habib Ullah17 found 106 culture positive cases of neonatal sepsis, with group B streptococcus being the most common organism (23%) particularly in early onset and very early onset neonatal sepsis. Ohlsson et al18 were the first to report the emergence of group B streptococcus in Saudi Arabia in the early 1980s.

Multidrug resistance of the causative organisms of sepsis is a rapidly emerging, potentially disastrous problem.19,20 Our data show that Pakistan is no exception to this worldwide antimicrobial emergency. In fact, the situation is worst in developing countries because of the lack of control of the use of antibiotics, the non-existence of legislation on antibiotic prescription, over the counter sale of antibiotics, poor sanitary conditions, lack of basic facilities and practices such as hand washing, lack of surveillance of the standards of maternity homes, and the practices of traditional birth attendants, who deliver almost 80% of all babies.21

Our study shows a very high degree of resistance of Gram negative organisms to first line antibiotics. About 40% of S aureus were resistant to ampicillin. There is also high degree of resistance to cephalosporins by both Gram positive and Gram negative organisms. Only 43.5% of Pseudomonas were sensitive to ceftazidime. There is low degree of resistance to quinolones, particularly ofloxacin. This is a relatively new class of antibiotics, the use of which has recently become very common, particularly in general practice. Similar results have been reported from other parts of Pakistan. The pattern of sensitivity reported by Maryam et al9 for the Children's Hospital in Lahore (table 2) is similar to ours except that S aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were found to be much more resistant to quinolones.

Table 2

Pattern of resistance to various antibiotics in the Children's Hospital, Lahore

The data of Anwer et al1 from Karachi show 80% resistance to ampicillin but only 11–13% resistance to cefotaxime and 0–10% resistance to amikacin. Bhutta et al22 from Karachi also reported a high degree of resistance to ampicillin and gentamicin among Gram negative organisms.

Emerging multiple drug resistance has also been reported in other parts of the world. The data of Orrett and Shurland5 from Trinidad show 85% of S aureus are resistant to ampicillin, and Pseudomonas had 76.6% resistance to ceftazidime and 72.1% resistance to gentamicin. The study of Joshi et al8 from India shows a predominance of Gram negative bacteraemia (67.2%) in their series, which had 25–75% resistance to cephalosporins, 68–78% resistance to piperacillin, and 23–69% resistance to gentamicin.

Friedman et al11 from Toronto isolated ampicillin resistant E coli from 75% of infants with early onset neonatal sepsis and 53% from a group with late onset neonatal sepsis. Gentamicin resistance was found in 50% of the early onset group and 16% of the late onset group. Kaushik et al23 reported their bacterial isolates to be resistant to penicillin, ampicillin, and gentamicin, but with good sensitivity to third generation cephalosporins and netilmicin. Leibovitz et al24 reported the appearance of extremely virulent, multiresistant Klebsiella in their neonatal intensive care unit in Kaplan Hospital, Israel. Koksal et al,25 from India, reported a series of 35 cases of severe Gram negative neonatal sepsis, with all the organisms being resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin, ticarcillin, cefazoline, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftrioxone, and aminoglycoside. They treated these babies with meropenem and achieved 94.3% satisfactory clinical and bacterial response. The routine use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of group B streptococcus septicaemia in newborn babies has resulted in the appearance of ampicillin resistant Gram negative neonatal sepsis in a large number of developed countries.26–28

Antibiotic resistance is increasing world wide and has become a serious health problem in hospitals and the community. Infection with resistant organisms has been associated with treatment failure, higher morbidity and mortality, and increased costs. This has necessitated the development, implementation, and evaluation of policies on the use of antibiotics.13,19,29 Prudent use of antibiotics and antibacterials must be promoted to maintain the balanced microbial environment in which we live.30 Routine bacterial surveillance and study of their resistance patterns must be an essential component of neonatal care. A knowledge of these patterns is essential when local policies on the use of anitbiotics are being devised.


View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.