Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 7 June 2002
- Published on: 23 May 2002
- Published on: 7 June 2002Authors’ reply: SHOs attitudes towards the neonatal examinationShow More
Dear Editor
we would like to thank Drs Millman and Satodia for their considerate comments on our paper.[1] The randomised controlled trial reported in the Archives is part of a larger evaluation study of the implications and cost effectiveness of extending the role of midwives to include the routine (24 hour) examination of the newborn. The evaluation study includes, apart from the RCT, a longer term follow-up (...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 23 May 2002Attitudes to routine neonatal examinationShow More
Dear Editor
We read with interest the findings of Wolke et al.[1] regarding maternal satisfaction with routine examination of the newborn. Whilst appreciating their conclusions and those reached by others (Lee TWR et al.[2] and Walker D[3])we wish to provide further comment. Perhaps an equally valuable study would be one which explores the attitudes of senior house officers to performing this examinat...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.