AIM To determine changes in brain haemodynamics produced by dexamethasone; to evaluate the pathophysiological conditions involved in the effect of dexamethasone.
METHODS A prospective study was made of 12 ventilated preterm infants who received dexamethasone (0.25 mg/kg/12 hours) for ongoing chronic lung disease or extubation failure. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), absolute cerebral blood volume (CBV), and cerebral blood volume changes (ΔCBV) were estimated by near infrared spectroscopy, before and 10, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 minutes after the first, third, and fifth doses of dexamethasone. All patients were monitored continuously using pulse oximetry, transcutaneous blood gases, and blood pressure.
RESULTS There were significant short term changes in ΔCBV on each day of the study; ΔCBV increased significantly at 240 minutes compared with values before the first dose, and from 120 minutes onward during the third and fifth doses. However, mean CBV values averaged over 240 minutes after the first, third, and fifth doses did not vary. Mean CBF values averaged over 240 minutes increased progressively up to the fifth dose (significant differences between the first and fifth dose). The short term changes in CBF consisted of a significant increase 60 minutes after dexamethasone administration compared with the before and 10 minute values in every study. Blood pressure was significantly higher in the third and fifth doses than in the first dose. Blood pressure showed no short term changes. There was no correlation between CBF and blood pressure changes. TcPCO2 (transcutaneous PCO2) decreased significantly throughout the study period, with the average mean value in the fifth dose significantly lower than in the first dose. Nevertheless, no short term changes in TcPCO2were observed.
CONCLUSIONS Postnatal systemic dexamethasone administration produced significant changes in cerebral haemodynamics that seemed to be related to both a direct effect on regional vessel walls and the cumulative effect of dexamethasone.
- cerebral haemodynamics
- near infrared spectroscopy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The use of systemic dexamethasone to prevent chronic lung disease in tiny preterm babies is widespread.1-4Increasingly, dexamethasone is used soon after birth5 6under the assumption that early administration may reduce lung injury at a time when the infant is most exposed to oxygen and barotrauma.6 However, we are concerned about the undesirable effects of systemic dexamethasone, particularly on blood pressure,7 and the possibility that dexamethasone, as a phospholipase A inhibitor that blocks arachidonic acid metabolism, could have important circulatory effects on different vascular territories. This motivated us to investigate the haemodynamic consequences of systemic dexamethasone on the central nervous system. Initially, we studied the effects of dexamethasone on the brain8 and eye9 in newborn pigs and found that dexamethasone increased cerebral and retinal blood flow according to radiolabelled microspheres during normoxia. Our next step was to study preterm infants who received dexamethasone to prevent chronic lung disease,10 in whom we found a significant increase in cerebral and ocular blood flow velocity after they received dexamethasone. This led us to speculate about the potentially harmful effect of dexamethasone on the brain and eye.
In the present study we used the same study protocol as in earlier studies10 except that we used near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). This technique allows several brain haemodynamics that may show parallel changes, depending on pathophysiological conditions, to be studied. This study proposed to clarify the mechanisms by which dexamethasone exerts its effect on brain circulation.
The 12 neonates studied had no congenital malformations or sepsis; the indication for dexamethasone was based on abnormal chest radiographs and ventilator weaning failure, as determined by the attending neonatologist. Six intravenous doses of dexamethasone, 0.25 mg/kg every 12 hours, were given in the first three days of treatment, after which the dose was tapered off. Written informed parental consent, approved by the Human Studies Committee of the La Paz University Hospital, was obtained for all infants before entry in the study.
Near infrared spectroscopy is based on continuous spectrophotometric measurement of oxygen dependent changes in the absorption properties of the chromophores haemoglobin and cytochrome aa3 in the near infrared range.11
Assuming a modification in the Beer–Lambert law, changes in oxyhaemoglobin (O2Hb), deoxyhaemoglobin (HHb), and oxidised cytochrome aa3 (Cytaa3) concentrations (c) (mM/l) can be obtained from changes in light absorption (A) (optical density): A= ecd where e is the extinction coefficient of the chromophore (mM/cm) and d is the optical path length (cm). In a medium like the brain, which produces intense scattering, the optical path length is longer than the distance between the points where light enters and leaves the tissue, and d has to be multiplied by a factor (path length factor). The extinction coefficients of O2Hb and HHb are known,12 so quantitative changes in the concentration of both chromophores can be calculated from changes observed in light attenuation at several wavelengths. The sum of the changes in O2Hb and HHb show the changes in total haemoglobin concentration (ΔTHb).
The NIRS equipment used was the commercial prototype Critikon Cerebral RedOX Monitor. The sensor is connected to the monitor with an electro-optic cable that contains electrical wires and a flexible fibre optic core consisting of a bundle of individual glass fibres. Light pulses from a laser in the monitor are transmitted through the fibre bundle to the sensor head (emission window). Light pulses emerging from the tissue are detected by a single photodiode housed in the sensor head. The signals from the sensor head are carried to the monitor by a shielded pair of electrical cores within the electro-optic cable. The laser diodes produce sequential pulses of monochromatic light, maintaining a precise spectral performance at factory calibrated wavelengths of 776.5, 819.0, 871.4 and 908.7 nm. Absorption of these four wavelengths is continuously sampled at a rate of 2 Hz. The haemoglobin absorption coefficients (O2Hb and HHb) used were derived directly from absorption spectra data published by Wrayet al. 12 Wavelength dependent scattering factors are incorporated into the inverse matrix. The values of the wavelength dependent scattering factors were calculated by fitting a polynomial curve to the data of Essenpries et al 13 and Thorniley et al.14 In the present study a fixed path length factor of 4.415 was used. Quantified chromophore concentration data are presented in micromolar units. The sensor was placed frontally in all patients.
CALCULATION OF CHANGES IN ΔCBV
This parameter may be continuously estimated by NIRS, because ΔTHb(μmol/l) is proportional to ΔCBV (ml/100g), using the equation16: ΔCBV=K· ΔTHb / H where the value of the constant K, 0.89, is obtained from the molecular weight of haemoglobin (64500), brain tissue density (1.05 g/m1), the large vessel:tissue ratio, which is assumed to be equal to 0.69,17 and decimal conversions. H is the haemoglobin concentration in a large vessel blood sample. In the present study ΔTHb was calculated as the difference between the baseline value (related to an arbitrary zero) and the mean value of all samples obtained in the 20 second period before each measurement defined in the study protocol.
MEASUREMENT OF CBV
To quantify CBV in absolute terms we used the method of Wyattet al, 18 which is based on the indicator–dilution principle. When the infant is stable and CBF and the cerebral metabolic oxygen rate are constant, O2Hb is used as a tracer by increasing the oxygen content in inspired air. The small increase in saturation that results and the parallel decrease in HHb are used to measure total cerebral haemoglobin, which is proportional to CBV.
To quantify CBV we changed the inspired oxygen fraction by 10–20% for 2–5 minutes so that the tracer was at a steady state and balanced throughout the brain: CBV= K · Δ (O2Hb-HHb)/2 · ΔSaO2 · H where K and H are as defined above, and ΔSaO2 is the change in haemoglobin saturation.
MEASUREMENT OF CBF
Using O2Hb as an intravascular tracer, CBF was calculated, based on the Fick principle.19-21 A sudden small change in O2Hb was induced by giving the patient a higher inspired fraction of oxygen for several breaths, which caused SaO2 to rise rapidly by about 5%. CBF was calculated from the changes in both parameters recorded over a 6–8 second period: CBF= K · Δ(O2Hb-HHb)/ 2 · H · integral [0→t] of ΔSaO2 where K and H have been defined.
Before measuring cerebral blood flow (O2Hb–HHb) and SaO2 should be stable for a period longer than the maximal cerebral transit time. The analysis of the NIRS curves, including quality check of the raw data and rejection of the measurement or calculation of CBF, were made off-line using a custom made computer program and an algorithm that has been published before.22
After a period of stabilisation, the first NIRS measurements were used as baseline values (DEX-0). Dexamethasone was administered as an intravenous bolus and NIRS measurements were repeated at 10 (DEX-10), 30 (DEX-30), 60 (DEX-60), 120 (DEX-120), 180 (DEX-180) and 240 (DEX-240) minutes. Because of limitations in the procedure, specifically the steady state recovery time of at least 5 minutes between measurements, CBF was measured one to three (median one) times 15–30 minutes before drug administration, once for DEX-10, and one to three times (median one) for every other period. Absolute CBV was quantified once 5 minutes before dexamethasone administration, and once at each measurement period. Every day of the study (during the first, third, and fifth dose) ΔCBV was estimated continuously in relation to baseline value (DEX-0), an arbitrary zero.
All NIRS studies were performed by the same investigator (AP). No patient had received medication likely to affect cerebral circulation. Every measurement was made with the patient in a quiet state and under stable oxygenation, ventilation, and haemodynamic conditions. For the more than 4 hours that each study period lasted, patients remained undisturbed, in the same position, and did not receive medication. Tracheal aspiration was carried out 1 hour before dexamethasone and when the NIRS study concluded 4 hours later.
Before beginning treatment with dexamethasone and after every NIRS study, a complete cerebral ultrasound scan was performed to detect changes in parenchymal echogenicity or periventricular–intraventricular haemorrhage. All cerebral ultrasound studies were performed by the same investigator (FC).
Patients were monitored continuously for heart rate, breathing rate, transcutaneous PCO2 and PO2. Arterial oxygen saturation was measured on every pulse beat by pulse oximetry (Fas Trac, Critikon). Blood pressure was measured by oscillometry (Dynamap, Critikon inc; Tampa, FL, USA) at each measurement period defined above. Total haemoglobin concentration was measured every day of the study using a Coulter counter.
NIRS and other data were stored on magnetic disc for later analysis.
To study the evolution of the variables throughout the study, two sources of variation (factors) were assumed: (a) the effect of the cumulative dose (dose factor) by days of treatment (changes between doses); and (b) variation over the 240 minute period (time factor) after administering each dose (intradose or short term changes). We analysed the effect of each factor independently and determined if there was interaction or synergy between them. Two way analysis of variance for repeated measures, factoring for time and dose, was used to study their effect on the following parameters: CBF, CBV, blood pressure, heart rate, and PCO2. Three doses (first, third, and fifth doses) and seven times (DEX-0, DEX-10, DEX-30, DEX-60, DEX-120, DEX-180, DEX-240) were considered. Firstly, we studied the main effects of each factor—that is, the behaviour of the average values obtained for each dose, or the average value of the three doses for each time. In the case of interaction between the two factors, the individual effects of time within each dose were also analysed. In this study interaction was interpreted as the difference between the profiles of the times within each dose. We used logarithmic transformation to study the significance of changes in CBF.
For ΔCBV, we analysed only the effect of time for each dose because the cumulative effect of dose could not be evaluated as it is a relative value that cannot be compared between doses. A post hoc test for pairwise comparisons was carried out using the Bonferroni procedure.25 26 A correlation analysis was developed to examine the relation between blood pressure and CBF measurements. p values <0.05 were considered significant.
The patients’ characteristics and clinical data are shown in table 1. The evolution of the respiratory profile, as expressed by the intradose and interdose supplementary oxygen requirements and mean airway pressure, is shown in fig 1. The mean values averaged over 240 minutes for CBV, CBF, blood pressure, heart rate, and TcPCO2 after the first, third, and fifth doses of dexamethasone and mean baseline values (before dexamethasone) are shown in table 2.
There was a significant increase in blood volume after dexamethasone administration. The short term changes in ΔCBV for each day of study are shown in fig 2. Post hoc analysis disclosed differences, as a function of time for each dose with respect to DEX-0 values, 240 minutes after dexamethasone for the first dose, and from 120 minutes onwards during the third and fifth doses (fig 2). However, mean CBV values averaged for 240 minutes after the first, third, and fifth doses did not vary significantly (table 2).
Mean CBF values averaged for 240 minutes increased progressively up to the fifth dose (table 2). Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed significant changes between the first and fifth doses. In every study the short term changes in CBF were similar, with a significant increase 60 minutes after dexamethasone in relation to DEX-0 and DEX-10 values (fig 3).
The physiological variables blood pressure, heart rate, and PCO2 also varied across the entire study period (table 2). Blood pressure values during the third and fifth doses were significantly higher than in the first dose, whereas heart rate was significantly lower in the third and fifth doses than in the first dose. The short term changes in blood pressure showed no significant differences on any study day (fig 3). There was no correlation between CBF and blood pressure changes.
TcPCO2 decreased significantly throughout the study period; the averaged mean value during the fifth dose was significantly lower than during the first dose. Although there were also short term changes in TcPCO2, which was lower at DEX-240 than at DEX-0, the differences were not significant.
We found no interaction between the effect of dose and time in our analysis of the behaviour of these variables.
Cerebral ultrasound findings before and during dexamethasone treatment, and 40 weeks after conception were: periventricular–intraventricular haemorrhage grades I–III in eight patients; abnormally increased periventricular echogenicity in six patients, four of whom also had periventricular–intraventricular haemorrhage; and two patients with normal cerebral ultrasound scans. No patient had clinically significant sonographic changes during dexamethasone treatment. At 40 weeks after conception, seven patients had normal sonograms; three had persistent periventricular echogenicity, one with mild ventricular dilation; one with posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt; and the remaining patient, who died at 48 days, showed a persistent increase in periventricular echogenicity at 30 days of life.
Complications that could be related to steroid use in our patients were hypertension (three cases) and necrotising enterocolitis (one case). Three patients required laser treatment for severe retinopathy of prematurity.
As in our earlier study,10 we found significant changes in several haemodynamic parameters. The behaviour of CBV was analysed from two vantage points: intradose effects by continuous monitoring of changes in THb after dexamethasone administration (ΔCBV), and the cumulative effect of dexamethasone by comparing CBV changes throughout the study period. Changes in CBF were studied within each dose and in response to repeated doses of dexamethasone.
Although this and our earlier study10 had the same design, the two study populations were not comparable because of limitations in the techniques. In our experience the Doppler probe applied over the anterior fontanelle modifies NIRS traces, causing artefacts to be recorded, which makes results unreliable. This effect probably has to do with interruption of the venous drainage in the sagittal sinus. To avoid this undesirable effect of the method, we evaluated the second population only by NIRS to verify if the changes in cerebral blood flow velocity and resistance index observed in our first study corresponded with changes in CBF, as determined by NIRS, in the present study.
In this study dexamethasone had substantial effects on cerebral haemodynamics. The short term changes in ΔCBV suggest drug induced cerebral vasodilation, which increased vascular volume and lowered cerebrovascular resistance. This observation was coupled with a significant increase in CBF 60 minutes after dexamethasone administration.
An analysis of the behaviour of such haemodynamic parameters throughout the study showed that CBV remained within a similar range, but that CBF values increased progressively up to the fifth dose.
These NIRS findings concur with the Doppler changes found in our previous study,10 indicating that dexamethasone seems to have a direct effect on the vessel wall. In our Doppler study the short term changes in cerebral blood flow velocity were similar to the CBF changes seen in the NIRS study. Moreover, the cerebral blood flow velocity changes throughout the Doppler study period concurred with the CBF changes observed in the NIRS study. An inverse variation in the resistance index was also observed, indicating possible vasodilation of the vessels investigated. On the other hand, the short term changes in ΔCBV increased progressively after each dexamethasone dose and reached their highest values later than CBF, which could be attributed to a more prolonged and/or potent vasodilator effect on the venous compartment than on the arteriolar–capillary territory. The transmission of positive pressures to intrathoracic structures may have important effects on ΔCBV. Leahy et al 27showed that the increase in CBV with intermittent positive pressure ventilation was proportional to lung compliance. In our patients fractional inspired oxygen concentration and mean airway pressure requirements remained unchanged for most of the patients on every day of the study (fig 1). At the time, intradose PCO2 changes were not significant. These two facts precluded a significant improvement in lung mechanics, and an increase in transpulmonary pressures impeded venous drainage, contributing to the increase in ΔCBV observed in the 4 hours after every dexamethasone dose. Nevertheless, a positive effect on lung compliance was described when respiratory performance beyond the first day of dexamethasone treatment was compared with pre-dexamethasone values.28
Another important aspect to consider is that NIRS serves to analyse haemodynamic changes that correspond to a representative portion of brain, but regional variations cannot be excluded. In fact, in our previous report using colour Doppler flow imaging,10 we found a similar trend in the behaviour of cerebral blood flow velocity, ocular blood flow velocity, and the resistance index, but the changes were less dramatic in the ophthalmic artery than in the anterior cerebral artery or carotid artery.
In both the NIRS and Doppler studies we found a significant increase in blood pressure. However, neither of the studies showed any association between changes in arterial pressure and changes in cerebral haemodynamic parameters. Moreover, in this study short term changes in CBF did not correlate with blood pressure changes. We feel that this finding reinforces the idea of a direct vascular effect which modifies brain circulation and seems to be independent of the changes exerted by dexamethasone on blood pressure.
The changes in cerebral haemodynamic parameters observed in the present study cannot be attributed to blood gas variations (table 2) because TcPCO2 tended to decrease throughout the study period; such a decrease would have had an opposite effect on the haemodynamic variables evaluated.16 29 30
In an experimental study in piglets9 we found a significant increase in retinal blood flow during normoxia after dexamethasone administration, compared with a control group. Vitreous prostanoids and leucotrienes were significantly lower after dexamethasone infusion. The changes observed in cerebral circulatory parameters after dexamethasone could be related to the effect of the drug on arachidonic acid metabolism because dexamethasone is an inhibitor of phospholipase A and therefore reduces prostanoids, leucotrienes, and free radical generation, which regulate vasomotor tone physiologically. However, other pharmacological effects of dexamethasone may be involved, resulting in a predominant vasodilator effect.31-34 Thus dexamethasone increases the release of natriuretic peptides,31 32 stabilises cell membranes, and inhibits free oxygen radical reactions,33 34 all properties that may promote vasodilation.
The changes observed in brain haemodynamics after systemic administration of steroids are of concern, particularly when these drugs are given soon after birth, because the risk of developing intracranial haemorrhage in an immature brain is theoretically greater. In our opinion, these findings do not contradict earlier reports of the beneficial effects of reducing periventricular haemorrhage by prenatal steroid administration.35 36 Prenatal steroids improve cardiovascular function in preterm births,37 38 thus protecting the brain against the undesirable effects of haemodynamic instability.39
In summary, our study showed substantial changes in brain circulation after systemic dexamethasone, which concurs with our findings in studies in neonatal animal models8 9 and in human preterm infants.10 These changes indicate that dexamethasone has a direct vasodilator effect. Prospective studies should be conducted to test the impact of dexamethasone using different protocols. Likewise, given the vulnerability of the immature brain to ischaemic and haemorrhagic lesions in the first days of life, early dexamethasone administration merits particular attention.
This study was supported by grant from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS 94/0198).
We thank Rosario Madero, from the Research Unit of La Paz University Hospital, for her valuable cooperation in statistics.
This study was presented, in part, at the European Society for Pediatric Research, Annual Meeting, Alicante, Spain, September, 1995.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.