Objectives Current neonatal resuscitation guidelines suggest the use of ECG in the delivery room (DR) to assess heart rate (HR). However, reliability of ECG compared with pulse oximetry (PO) in a situation of bradycardia has not been specifically investigated. The objective of the present study was to compare HR monitoring using ECG or PO in a situation of bradycardia (HR <100 beats per minute (bpm)) during preterm stabilisation in the DR.
Study design Video recordings of resuscitations of infants <32 weeks of gestation were reviewed. HR readings in a situation of bradycardia (<100 bpm) at any moment during stabilisation were registered with both devices every 5 s from birth.
Results A total of 29 episodes of bradycardia registered by the ECG in 39 video recordings were included in the analysis (n=29). PO did not detect the start of these events in 20 cases (69%). PO detected the start and the end of bradycardia later than the ECG (median (IQR): 5 s (0–10) and 5 s (0–7.5), respectively). A decline in PO accuracy was observed as bradycardia progressed so that by the end of the episode PO offered significantly lower HR readings than ECG.
Conclusions PO detects the start and recovery of bradycardia events slower and less accurately than ECG during stabilisation at birth of very preterm infants. ECG use in this scenario may contribute to an earlier initiation of resuscitation manoeuvres and to avoid unnecessary prolongation of resuscitation efforts after recovery.
- pulse oximetry
- neonatal resuscitation
- preterm newborns
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors BI contributed to the design of the study, participated in the recruitment of patients and data analysis, and approved the final version of the manuscript. MJR, EA and EC participated in the recruitment of patients, reviewed the video recordings and approved the final version of the manuscript. JMO participated in data analysis and collaborated in the preparation of the manuscript. LA designed and coordinated the study, participated in patient recruitment and data analysis, and wrote the original draft of the manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clinico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.