Article Text

PDF
Variation of practice and poor outcomes for extremely low gestation births: ordained before birth?
  1. Annie Janvier1,2,
  2. Jason Baardsnes3,4,
  3. Michael Hebert3,
  4. Stephanie Newell3,
  5. Neil Marlow5
  1. 1 Department of Pediatrics, Bureau de l’Éthique Clinique, Université de Montréa, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  2. 2 Department of Neonatology, Clinical Ethics Unit, Palliative Care Unit, Research Center, Unité de Recherche en éthique Clinique et partenariat famille, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  3. 3 Parent representative
  4. 4 Department of Human Health Therapeutics, National Research Council, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
  5. 5 Neonatology, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Annie Janvier, Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Ethics, University of Montreal, Neonatologist and Clinical Ethicist, Sainte-Justine Hospital, 3175 Chemin Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada; anniejanvier{at}hotmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Decision-making for extremely preterm infants is ethically complex and wide variations of practice exist within and between countries. The investigators of the EPIPAGE (epidemiological study on small gestational ages) 2 study have studied outcomes for all births between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation in France during 2011. In their current study, they explored the variation in proactive antenatal care across the country.1 They demonstrate huge variation in the proportion of preterm infants who received active antepartum interventions, ranging from 22% to 61%. Alongside these data, they show immense variation in the proportion of babies at different gestational weeks born alive but who subsequently died in the delivery room—45% of live births at 24 weeks died before admission, and 90% at 23 weeks. In total, only 28% of liveborn babies survived at 24 weeks and there were no survivors below this.

In EPICure 2 (population based study of survival and outcomes in extremely premature infants), a similar study that took place in England, there were differences in mortality between non-neonatal intensive care unit (non-NICU) and NICU centres across the board.2 Similar large variations in mortality occurred in 2006 in the same gestational range as EPIPAGE 2; although overall non-active neonatal care only explained 32% of the variance between populations, at 23 weeks it was as high as 76%. In a recent National Institute of Child Health study, interventions in the delivery room explained 78% of the variance in mortality between the constituent hospitals.3

These variations reflect a prevailing pessimistic philosophy regarding extreme prematurity. National policies often use death and adverse outcomes to justify non-intervention in …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Original article
    Caroline Diguisto François Goffinet Elsa Lorthe Gilles Kayem Jean-Christophe Roze Pascal Boileau Babak Khoshnood Valérie Benhammou Bruno Langer Loic Sentilhes Damien Subtil Elie Azria Monique Kaminski Pierre-Yves Ancel Laurence Foix–L’Hélias
  • Fantoms
    Ben J Stenson