You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 100, Issue 2
  • Response to: ‘Reliability of National Neonatal Audit Project's retinopathy of prematurity screening data’ by Finer and colleagues

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Letters
Response to: ‘Reliability of National Neonatal Audit Project's retinopathy of prematurity screening data’ by Finer and colleagues
  1. Andrew J Lyon
  1. Correspondence to Dr Andrew J Lyon, 11 Stennis Gardens, Edinburgh EH17 7QW, UK; andy.lyon{at}clevermed.com

https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307554

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The letter by Neil Finer and others1 raises important questions around quality and completeness of data used for national benchmarking.

    The authors criticise the quality of the National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) data used in the published 2012 report. They show in one unit where there were inaccuracies due to data not being entered into the Badger system. They give examples of how the Badger system possibly …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests AJL works with and receives payment from Clevermed.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.