To:
ADC Online Letters and ADC Education and Practice Letters
Electronic Letters to:
|
|
Electronic letters published:
|
|
|||
|
Ben C Reynolds, Paediatric SpR RHSC, Glasgow
Send letter to journal:
pinkdoc{at}doctors.net.uk Ben C Reynolds
|
Dear Editor, It was somewhat disheartening to receive this month's Archives Fetal and Neonatal Edition to be greeted by a picture illustrating a readily avoidable cause of neonatal infection. From the very beginning of my time in neonatology, I have always been instructed (and subsequently instructed more junior staff) to thoroughly wash their hands and remove any items of jewellery, including wristwatches! I can only hope that the offending photograph will be used in teaching sessions to indicate what not to do to control nosocomial infection within the neonatal unit. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Ailis C Orr, Paediatric SHO3 Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Sciennes Road, Edinburgh
Send letter to journal:
ailis3{at}yahoo.co.uk Ailis C Orr
|
Dear Editor, I was disappointed to note the cover photograph of the most recent issue of Archives (Fetal and Neonatal Edition)so prominently displaying such a blatant image of disregard for infection control. It is widely acknowledged that truly clean hands should be naked from finger-tip to elbow and that subsequently, success of even thorough handwashing is considerably diminished by the presence of a wristwatch. (1) There can be few situations in which infection control is of more vital importance than the handling of a premature neonate, particularly as in this case, with multiple indwelling catheters. I hope that in future the journal will take more care to display best practice as is the case with written articles. Reference: 1.House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology.Seventh report. London Stationery Office. 1998. Wrist watches must be removed before washing hands. |
|||
