Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.. Published Online First: 10 November 2008. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.140434
Original articles |
Prognosis in isolated gastroschisis with bowel dilatation: a systematic review
1 University of Manchester, United Kingdom
2 Belfast Royal Jubilee Hospital, United Kingdom
3 Birmingham Women's Hospital, United Kingdom
4 University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: clare.tower{at}manchester.ac.uk.
Accepted 14 October 2008
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate prognosis of the fetus with isolated gastroschisis and bowel dilatation from a systematic review of the literature. We aimed to compare the incidence of a) intrauterine death b) death within 4 weeks of delivery c) bowel resection, d) length of time to oral feeds, e) time as inpatient in fetuses with gastroschisis with and without evidence of bowel dilatation.
Methods: Literature was identified by searching two bibliographical databases between 1980 and 2007. Studies were assessed for quality and stratified according to the definition of bowel dilatation. The data extracted was inspected for clinical and methodological heterogeneity.
Results: The search strategy yielded 1335 potentially relevant citations. Full manuscripts were retrieved for 92 citations. 10 studies (273 patients) were finally included in the systematic review. No difference was found between groups for death within 4 weeks of delivery (OR = 0.62; (95% CI 0.11 to 3.32); heterogeneity p = 0.39) or bowel resection (OR = 3.35 (95% CI 0.82 to 13.74); heterogeneity p = 0.39). There was insufficient data to compare the risk of intrauterine death and length of time to oral feeds. The mean inpatient stay was not significantly different (OR =16.63; (95% CI 0.98 to 32.28); heterogeneity p = 0.23).
Conclusion: Current available evidence suggests that fetuses with isolated gastroschisis and bowel dilatation are not at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome, compared to those without bowel dilatation. However, there is a paucity of studies, and a randomised controlled trial is urgently needed.
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



