Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.. Published Online First: 7 May 2008. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.122465
Review |
The value of the postnatal examination in improving child health
1 Bradford Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sam.oddie{at}bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk.
Accepted 23 April 2008
Abstract
Here we have reviewed the evidence that a standardised examination in the newborn period can improve infant health. We have considered aspects of delivering such a service from timing and number of examinations through to who should perform examinations, and if evidence supports current practice. Patients at higher risk of anomaly such as those born preterm are highlighted.
We have reviewed aspects of the examination itself, such as detection of congenital heart disease, and the relatively poor detection rate which does not appear to be improving. Potential additive advantages of additional screening with pulse oximetry are covered.
Additionally we have covered screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip which the Uk national screening council is unsure of the benefit of, the difficulties of detecting all cases of cleft palate and problems with screening for the very important congenital catarract. We have paid attention to the relative rarity of some conditions and reflected on how this complicates screening
Relevant Article
- Fantoms
- Martin Ward Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 93: F329.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



