Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2008

Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.. Published Online First: 17 August 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.113597
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.113597v1
adc.2006.113597v2
93/3/F217    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samaan, M.C.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samaan, M.C.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, C. A.

Original articles

Physicians’ and nurses’ attitudes towards neonatal ethical decision-making in Ireland

M.C. Samaan 1*, V. Cassotto 2, M. Cuttini 3 and C. A. Ryan 1

1 Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, University College Cork, Erinville Hospital,Cork, Republic of Ireland
2 Osservatorio di Epidemiologia, Agenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana, Sede Operativa,Fire, Italy
3 Unità di Epidemiologia,Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù,P.zza S.Onofrio 4,00165 Roma, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mcsamaan1{at}yahoo.com.

Accepted 10 August 2007


*   Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical staff attitudes towards ethical decision-making in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Ireland, establish differences between physicians and nurses, and compare attitudes in Ireland to those in Europe.

Design: Cross-sectional study by means of an anonymous questionnaire. Sixty-four physicians and 228 nurses in seven NICUs participated (response rates 76 and 79%, respectively). Through factor analysis the staff answers to 12 attitude statements were used to build a score whose range varied from zero (preservation of life in any case) to 10, indicating a more individualized approach according to patient’s best interest.

Main outcome measure: Staff attitudes to ethical decision-making in NICU.

Results: Mean values of attitude scores were 5.8 (95% CI 5.3-6.2) for physicians, and 6.0 (95% CI 5.5-6.5) for nurses. Respondents with experience in follow-up of NICU graduates had significantly higher scores (6.7 versus 5.4, p=0.018), while the opposite was true among more religious staff (5.8 versus 6.9, p=0.026) and particularly for minority religions such as Muslim (4.1, 95% CI 3.1-5.2). Scores were higher after age 30 for nurses, and after age 40 for doctors, suggesting the adoption of a less vitalistic viewpoint as respondents grow older and more experienced. Among physicians, a relationship was found between the attitude score and their self-reported non-treatment practices.

Conclusions: In Ireland, NICU doctors and nurses hold similar attitudes towards ethical decision-making. Personal and professional factors have a statistically significant impact on attitude score. Compared to the rest of Europe, attitudes in Ireland appear more similar to those of Southern European rather than Northern European countries.


Keywords: EURONIC, Ethics, NICU







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health