Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 November 2007

Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.. Published Online First: 25 April 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.103929
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Original articles

Cardiorespiratory effects of changes in end expiratory pressure in ventilated newborns

Koert A de Waal 1*, Nick Evans 2, David A Osborn 3 and Martin Kluckow 4

1 Academic Medical Centre, Netherlands
2 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
3 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia
4 University of Sydney, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: k.a.dewaal{at}amc.uva.nl.

Accepted 19 April 2007


Abstract

Background:Positive pressure ventilation in premature infants can improve oxygenation, but may also diminish cerebral blood flow and cardiac output. Low brain and upper body flow (superior vena cava flow, SVC) increases the risk of intraventricular haemorrhage, with previous research showing that higher mean airway pressure is associated with low SVC flow. It is not known whether this is a direct effect of positive pressure ventilation or a reflection of severity of lung disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ventilated newborns could be increased without causing clinically relevant cardiorespiratory changes.

Methods:Ventilated newborns were studied before and 10 minutes after increasing PEEP from 5 to 8 cmH2O, then again when returned to baseline. Simultaneous echocardiographic and respiratory function measurements were collected during the intervention.

Results:Fifty infants were studied. Overall, increased PEEP was associated with a non-significant difference in mean SVC flow of -5 ml/kg/min (95%CI -12 to 3) but a significant reduction in right ventricular output of 17 ml/kg/min (95%CI 5 to 28). There was a non-significant increase in lung compliance of (median difference 0.02 ml/cmH2O/kg; p 0.093) and a significant decrease in lung resistance of 18 cmH2O/L/s (95%CI 10 to 26). There was a positive association between % change in lung compliance and % change in SVC flow when corrected for paCO2 changes (regression coefficient 0.4 % (95%CI 0.2 to 0.6)).

Conclusion:A short-term increase in PEEP does not result in a significant change in systemic blood flow, although 36% of infants had clinically important changes in flow (+/-25%).The intervention can improve dynamic lung function, especially airway resistance. Improvements in compliance tend to be associated with improvements in blood flow.

Keywords: cardiac output, echocardiography, newborn, respiration, artificial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs