Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2008

Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.. Published Online First: 11 July 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.086314
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2005.086314v1
93/3/F187    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, D. M
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, D. M
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Original articles

Defining the gap between electrographic seizure burden, clinical expression, and staff recognition of neonatal seizures

Deirdre M Murray 1, Geraldine B Boylan 2, Imhad Ali 3, C. Anthony Ryan 4*, Brendan P Murphy 5 and Sean Connolly 6

1 University College Cork, Republic of Ireland
2 University College Cork, Eire
3 Unified Maternity Services, Cork, Republic of Ireland
4 Cork University Maternity Hospital, Republic of Ireland
5 University College Cork, Republic of Ireland
6 St Vincent's Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ryant01{at}eircom.net.

Accepted 30 June 2007


*   Abstract

Background: Neonatal seizures are often sub-clinical, making accurate diagnosis difficult. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical manifestations of electrographic seizures recorded on continuous video-EEG, and to compare this to the recognition of clinical seizures by experienced neonatal staff.

Methods: Term infants, at risk of seizures, were monitored by continuous 12-channel video-EEG from < 6 hours of birth for up to 72 hours. All clinical seizures were recorded by experienced neonatal staff on individual seizure charts. Video-EEG recordings were subsequently analyzed. The number, duration, and clinical expression of electrographic seizures were calculated (in seconds), and compared to the seizures clinically suspected by the neonatal staff.

Results: Of 51 infants enrolled, 9 had electrographic seizures. A further 3 had clinically suspected seizures, without associated electrographic abnormality. Of the total 526 electrographic seizures, 179 (34%) had clinical manifestations evident on the simultaneous video recording. The clinical seizure activity corresponded to 18.7% of the total electrographic seizure burden. Over-diagnosis also occurred frequently. Of the 177 clinically-suspected seizure episodes documented by staff, 48(27%) had corresponding electrographic evidence of seizure activity Thus, only 9% (48/526) of electrographic seizures were accompanied by clinical manifestations, which were identified and documented by neonatal staff.

Conclusion: Only one third of neonatal EEG seizures display clinical signs on simultaneous video recordings. Moreover, two-thirds of these clinical manifestations are unrecognised, or mis-interpreted by experienced neonatal staff. In the recognition and management of neonatal seizures clinical diagnosis alone is not enough.


Keywords: hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, neonatal, seizure burden, seizures, video-EEG


Related Article

Fantoms
Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 93: F173. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health