Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 July 2005

Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.. Published Online First: 17 May 2005. doi:10.1136/adc.2004.065250
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Original articles

Erythromycin as a prokinetic agent in preterm neonates - A systematic review

Sanjay K Patole 1*, Shripada Rao 2 and Dorota Doherty 3

1 Neonatal Paediatrics, KEM Hospital for Women,, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
2 Neonatal Paediatrics, KEM Hospital for Women, Perth, Australia
3 Women and Infants Research Foundation at King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women and School of Women, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: skpatole{at}hotmail.com.

Accepted 23 January 2005


Abstract

Background:It often takes several days or even weeks to establish full enteral feeds (FEF) in preterm, especially extremely low birth weight neonates due to feed intolerance related to gastrointestinal hypomotility. Clinical trials of erythromycin as a prokinetic agent in preterm neonates have reported conflicting results.

Aim:To systematically review the efficacy and safety of erythromycin as a prokinetic agent in preterm neonates.

Methods:Only randomised-controlled trials in preterm neonates (gestation ≤37 weeks) were considered eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the time to reach FEF of 150ml/kg/day. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of erythromycin related adverse effects such as diarrhea, cardiac arrythmias, and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. No restrictions were applied on the dose (low: 3-12mgm.kg/day, antimicrobial: ≥12mgm/kg/6-8 hours), route (oral or intravenous), and mode (prophylactic or rescue) of administration. The standard methodology for systematic reviews was followed. A subgroup analysis was preplanned based on the dose and mode of drug administration.

Results:Seven trials (prophylaxis: 3, rescue: 4) with varying dosages,routes-modes of administration, and durations of erythromycin treatment and different results were found eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Meta analysis could not be performed, as specific data was either inadequate or not available.

Conclusion:The conflicting trial results may be explained by differences in dose, route, and mode of administration of erythromycin and in gastrointestinal motor responses in presence of different feeding conditions (eg. fasting vs fed state, intermittent vs continuous feeds). The implications of gestational and postnatal ages during erythromycin treatment are also important.

Keywords: enteral, erythromycin, feeding, preterm


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Fantoms
Martin Ward Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 90: F283. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs