Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2007;92:F161-F162; doi:10.1136/adc.2006.109439
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

PERSPECTIVE

Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights

Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired?

Richard A Ehrenkranz

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
R A Ehrenkranz
Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208064, New Haven, CT 06520-8064; richard.ehrenkranz@yale.edu


Perspective on the paper by Cooke (see page F189)

Abbreviations: AGA, appropriate for gestational age; EFW, estimated fetal weight; FGR, fetal growth restriction; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; LGA, large for gestational age; SGA, small for gestational age

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Presentation of intrauterine or fetal growth in the form of centile curves based on birth weight was first reported by Lubchenco and her co-workers in 1963.1 In that publication, data on the birth weights of 5635 live born Caucasian infants 24 to 42 weeks of gestation were analyzed. The data were presented in figures and tables that displayed smoothed 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles for males and females together and separately. The authors acknowledged several limitations to their analysis, including: "The sample has an undeterminable bias because premature birth itself is probably related to unphysiological states of variable duration in either mother or fetus. Since the weight of fetuses who remain in utero cannot be measured, the curves presented herein are submitted with these reservations as estimates of intrauterine growth." Nonetheless, the authors felt that the curves would be useful at birth, . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Conventional birth weight standards obscure fetal growth restriction in preterm infants
Richard W I Cooke
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 92: F189-F192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs