Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2006;91:F392-F394; doi:10.1136/adc.2006.099754
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finer, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finer, N
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

PERSPECTIVE

CPAP and ELBW infant

To intubate or not—that is the question: continuous positive airway pressure versus surfactant and extremely low birthweight infants

N Finer

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
N Finer
Department of Paediatrics/Neonatology, UCSD Medical Centre, 200 West Arbor Drive No 8774, San Diego, CA 92103-8774, USA;nfiner@ucsd.edu


Perspective on the paper by Booth et al (see page398)

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

There is currently a great dilemma regarding the early management of extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants, which involves the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after delivery compared with the use of prophylactic or early surfactant. Although there is good evidence that prophylactic and early surfactants reduce mortality and respiratory morbidity,1–4 few of these studies had large numbers of the smallest babies who are the longest-term residents of our neonatal intensive care units; also, none of the studies randomised infants in the placebo or control group to treatment with early CPAP. In addition, surfactant treatment may be associated with a lowered rate of milder disabilities at 1 year of age.5 The use of mechanical ventilation, especially in the first few days of life, seems to considerably increase the risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia as defined by the need for oxygen at 36 weeks,6,7 and the incidence . . . [Full text of this article]


Related Article

Sustainable use of continuous positive airway pressure in extremely preterm infants during the first week after delivery
C Booth, M H Premkumar, A Yannoulis, M Thomson, M Harrison, and A D Edwards
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 91: F398-F402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. C. Eichenwald and A. R. Stark
Management and Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight
N. Engl. J. Med., April 17, 2008; 358(16): 1700 - 1711.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health