PERSPECTIVE
High frequency oscillatory ventilation
High frequency oscillatory ventilation: is equivalence with conventional mechanical ventilation enough?
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Eichenwald
Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin, MC: WT6-104, Houston, TX 77030, USA; eichenwa@bcm.edu (after 1 July 2006); eeichenwald@partners.org (before 1 July 2006)
A perspective on the article by Marlow et al (see page 320)
Keywords: high frequency oscillatory ventilation; conventional ventilation; respiratory function
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Several investigators have reported short term results of trials comparing high frequency ventilation with conventional mechanical ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. However, very few data are available on longer term outcomes in infants randomised to these two very different modes of mechanical ventilation.1,2 In this issue, Marlow et al for the United Kingdom Oscillation Study Group (UKOS) report 2 year respiratory and neurological outcomes for the study cohort in their randomised trial of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) compared with conventional mechanical ventilation. Although the prevalence of disability in their study cohort was high, they found no significant differences in neurodevelopmental scores or report of respiratory symptoms at 2 years of age between infants randomised to the two modes of ventilatory support.
The original report of the short term outcomes of their trial, published in 2002, showed no difference in the primary outcome
Relevant Articles
- Fantoms
- Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 91: F313.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Randomised trial of high frequency oscillatory ventilation or conventional ventilation in babies of gestational age 28 weeks or less: respiratory and neurological outcomes at 2 years
- N Marlow, A Greenough, J L Peacock, L Marston, E S Limb, A H Johnson, S A Calvert for the United Kingdom Oscillation Study Group
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 91: F320-F326.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



