HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ward Platt, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ward Platt, M

Evaluation of the National Congenital Anomaly System in England and Wales

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Ward Platt
Ward 35, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; m.p.ward-platt@ncl.ac.uk

Keywords: congenital anomaly; surveillance

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In January, Boyd et al¹ drew attention to the shortcomings of the National Congenital Anomaly System (NCAS), and Archives now carries a complementary paper (page 368) examining the functionality of the system, measured against the standards suggested by the USA Center for Disease Control. In both reports, NCAS is found wanting. Can it be fixed, should it be fixed, or should it be abolished?

The problems with NCAS are well described in these two papers: very poor ascertainment, and no data on antenatally diagnosed cases, except when fed data by the regional congenital anomaly registers; massively incomplete data fields; and consequently a severely limited capacity to fulfil the role for which it was set up in the wake of the thalidomide disaster. Yet congenital anomaly remains a leading cause of death and disability, perinatally and in infancy. It continues to pose challenges to public health, . . . [Full text of this article]