COMMENTARY

Perinatal autopsy

Perinatal autopsy remains the "gold standard"

A Lyon

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Lyon
Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Scotland, UK; andrew.lyon@luht.scot.nhs.uk

---

A commentary on the review by Wright and Lee

---

Keywords: postmortem examination; necropsy; autopsy; death

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

There is little doubt that a full autopsy carried out by a perinatal pathologist, and supported by the techniques described in this review, remains the best method of investigating perinatal death. The authors discuss clearly the limitations of all other techniques, which, although capable of giving much useful information, have not yet been validated adequately against the properly performed perinatal autopsy. Permission for this procedure should be sought after all pregnancy losses and neonatal deaths.

Despite its importance, neonatal autopsy rates have been falling.¹ There are many reasons for this but of most concern is the possible decline in healthcare professionals’ understanding of its value. Recent controversies have made asking for an autopsy soon after birth even more stressful. Many may believe that, with better investigative techniques before death, the diagnosis is already known, and therefore either do not ask for an autopsy or do not give parents . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Fantoms

Martin Ward Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 89: F283. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hagmann, C F, Robertson, N J, Sams, V R, Brookes, J A S (2007). Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renal-tract abnormalities. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92: F215-F219 [Abstract] [Full Text]