© 2004 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition
COMMENTARY
Euthanasia
Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
R W Cooke;
Neonatal Unit, Liverpool Womens Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS; mc19@liv.ac.uk
A commentary on the paper by Cuttini et al
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The members of the EURONIC group have investigated the attitudes and practice of nurses and doctors with regard to euthanasia in neonatal units throughout Europe. Not surprisingly, they have found a wide range of beliefs and actions concerning an act that remains illegal for the newborn in all the countries studied. The group begin helpfully by defining what they mean by euthanasia, as debate is often confused by different understandings of what it means. Definitions range from "ending life...as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary treatment" to "act of killing painlessly (especially one suffering from an incurable illness)". In the United Kingdom especially, doctors often distinguish between "active" and "passive" euthanasia (the latter involving withdrawal of intensive care), despite ethicists denying a difference between these actions if the intention is to end life. Those supporting withdrawal of care in selected cases argue that their intention is to
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



