Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2003;88:F260-F262; doi:10.1136/fn.88.4.F260
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2003;88:F260
© 2003 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition

LEADING ARTICLE

Intensive care

Neonatal long lines

G Menon

Neonatal Unit, Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK Correspondence to: Dr G Menon, Neonatal Unit, Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, UK; gopi.menon@luht.scot.nhs.uk


Are they safe?

Keywords: cardiac tamponade; catheterisation; central venous; complications; infant

Abbreviations: CV, central venous; PCE, pericardial effusion; PN, parenteral nutrition; PVC, poly(vinyl chloride); UVC, umbilical venous catheter

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Central venous (CV) lines have been the subject of much professional debate and public exposure in the UK following an enquiry into the deaths of four children in Manchester as the result of cardiac tamponade. One of the recommendations of this review was that CV line tips should not be placed within the cardiac outline.1 This has been the recommendation of CV line manufacturers for some time.

In this issue, Beardsall et al report a retrospective questionnaire survey of pericardial effusion (PCE) and tamponade associated with percutaneously inserted central lines, together with a survey of current practice in percutaneously inserted central line use in neonatal units around the UK.2 They compare the incidence of PCE in units with different approaches to the use of percutaneously inserted central lines. Despite likely ascertainment and response bias, and unknown confounders, this study adds an important piece to the complex puzzle of . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Fantoms
Martin Ward Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 88: F260. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Neonatal long lines- Are they safe?
Suresh Chandran
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 9 Jul 2003 [Full text]
Neonatal long lines and pericardial effusions: a differance between silicone and polyurethane?
Antoine Bedu, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 8 Aug 2003 [Full text]
Catheter material
Gopi Menon
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 4 Sep 2003 [Full text]
Neonatal long lines and the risk of pericardial effusion
Kathryn Beardsall, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 6 Oct 2003 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs