Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2003;88:F166-F167; doi:10.1136/fn.88.3.F166
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2003;88:F166
© 2003 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition

LEADING ARTICLE

Informed consent

Obtaining consent for neonatal research

P Allmark1, S Mason2, A B Gill3, C Megone4

1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
2 Northern and Yorkshire Clinical Trials and Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
3 Peter Congdon Neonatal Unit, General Infirmary at Leeds, UK
4 Department of Philosophy, University of Leeds

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Allmark, Samuel Fox House, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK;
p.j.allmark@shef.ac.uk


Improvements to the informed consent process for neonatal research are considered

Keywords: informed consent; research; ethics

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Informed consent is given when a competent person who has received and understood sufficient information voluntarily decides whether or not to receive treatment or take part in research. It is widely seen as an essential component of most medical research. In the case of neonates, parents must make the decision. However, there are a number of reasons to think that such consent is not likely to meet the criteria for being genuine informed consent.

  1. Neonatal research often takes place in fraught circumstances. Parents may be suffering the emotional shock of unexpectedly having given birth to a seriously ill baby.
  2. The need for consent may be urgent; in other words, there may only be a few hours in which the parents are able to decide (as in birth asphyxia trials).
  3. The trial may be an "emergency trial".1 These trials combine an urgent need for consent with the fact that . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gelbart, B, Barfield, C, Watkins, A (2009). Ethical and legal considerations in video recording neonatal resuscitations. J. Med. Ethics 35: 120-124 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs